1981
DOI: 10.2307/2981918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Discrimination Techniques Applied to a Complex Data Set of Head Injured Patients

Abstract: Several techniques for discriminant analysis are applied to a set of data from patients with severe head injuries, for the purpose of prognosis. The data are such that multidimensionality, continuous, binary and ordered categorical variables and missing data must be coped with. The various methods are compared using criteria of prognostic success and reliability. In general, performance varies more with choice ofthe set of predictor variables than with that of the discriminant rule.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams (1959, Chapter 9), Brown (1979), Brown (1982), and Naes & Martens (1984) discuss linear multivariate calibration, the prediction of one or more quantitative variables from more than one quantitative response variable, assuming a linear model. Discrimination (calibration of a nominal explanatory variable) is treated by Lachenbruch (1975) in a general statistical context, by Titterington et al (1981) in a medical context and by Kanal (1974) in electrical engineering.…”
Section: Bibliographie Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams (1959, Chapter 9), Brown (1979), Brown (1982), and Naes & Martens (1984) discuss linear multivariate calibration, the prediction of one or more quantitative variables from more than one quantitative response variable, assuming a linear model. Discrimination (calibration of a nominal explanatory variable) is treated by Lachenbruch (1975) in a general statistical context, by Titterington et al (1981) in a medical context and by Kanal (1974) in electrical engineering.…”
Section: Bibliographie Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The naïve Bayes BN model is named by Titterington et al (1981) because of its simplicity. In a naïve Bayes model, the node of interest has to be the root node, which means, it has no parent nodes.…”
Section: A Naïve Bayes Bayesian Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then performed a serial multiple mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6; 26) in which missing values were replaced by group means (27). Office type (cellular office, shared office, small open office, medium-sized open office) was the predictor, ease of interaction at work was the first mediator, subjective well-being was the second mediator, and job satisfaction was the outcome variable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%