1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(96)00051-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of discretization algorithms for nurbs surfaces with application to numerically controlled machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, there is a robust body of work relating to populating lattice occupancy grids from continuous surfaces (one overview is [2]). If the lattice voxels are smaller than the machine's discrete steps, then the output will be optimally smooth.…”
Section: Asdfs Versus Bitmapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, there is a robust body of work relating to populating lattice occupancy grids from continuous surfaces (one overview is [2]). If the lattice voxels are smaller than the machine's discrete steps, then the output will be optimally smooth.…”
Section: Asdfs Versus Bitmapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surfaces were described as bicubic patches and the step size between toolpaths was calculated as a function of local patch properties to ensure an acceptable surface finish. Austin et al [21] compared several discretization strategies employed in the NC machining of NURBS surfaces and concluded that an algorithm based on parametric rectangular subdivision performed best. Sun et al [22] presented work focused specifically on machining free-form surfaces and computing optimal decompositions of the tasks involved to minimize machining time within surface finish and tolerance constraints.…”
Section: Endmilling Toolpath Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some other tool path generation methods such as j^ece curve mcfAwf (Austin et al, 1997;Shah et al, 1991), Ao-cwrvafwre (Jensen and Anderson, 1992), etc.. Extensive reviews on tool path planning maybe found in Marshall and Griffiths (1994), Dragomatz and Mann (1997), Jenson and Anderson (1996), S arma (2000).…”
Section: Prq/ecfkm Cwrvementioning
confidence: 99%