The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51974-2_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Discrete Autocorrelation Functions with Regards to Statistical Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For statistical research processing, quantitative techniques (Gauthier & Hawley, 2015;Kitchenham et al, 2017) were used as can be found in similar applied research with consideration of statistical significance (e.g. Barot et al, 2020;Lacková, 2014).…”
Section: Sample Data Collection and Statistical Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For statistical research processing, quantitative techniques (Gauthier & Hawley, 2015;Kitchenham et al, 2017) were used as can be found in similar applied research with consideration of statistical significance (e.g. Barot et al, 2020;Lacková, 2014).…”
Section: Sample Data Collection and Statistical Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the results of the research on class E children's and class K children's IMMCs were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test that is oft en used for paired comparison of small-scale data (Gauthier, Hawley, 2015;Barot et al, 2019Barot et al, , 2020. Th e signifi cance was determined at 5%.…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another preliminary operation of the algorithm is determining the auto-correlation function (ACF) of the impulse response. The ACF is defined as follows [18], [19] ( ) ( ) ( )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%