Comparison of Discovery Service Architectures for the Internet of Things

Evdokimov, S. A.; Fabian, Benjamin; Kunz, Steffen; Schoenemann, Nina

doi:10.1109/sutc.2010.22

Cited by 78 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Different strategies have been developed to solve different problems with various trade-offs. Biologically inspired [14], traditional P2P [8], DNS-based solutions [15], and Web-based solutions [16] are few of the most popular approaches.…”

Section: Architectural Issues In the Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Architecting the IoT Paradigm: A Middleware for Autonomous Distributed Sensor Networks

Eleftherakis¹,

Pappas

Λάγκας³

et al. 2015

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Actualizing Internet of Things undoubtedly constitutes a major challenge of modern computing and is a promising next step in realizing the unification of all seamlessly interacting entities, either human users or participating machines, under a shared, coherent architecture. While it has now become common belief that the related solutions should be based on compatible network infrastructure employing widely accepted communication schemes, the specifics of the intermediate system that would act as global interface for all involved "things" are yet to be determined. A rising trend to define such machine-based entities is through cyberphysical systems, in terms of collaborating elements with physical input and output. Certainly, sensor networks constitute the most representative realization of such systems. Taking these issues and opportunities under consideration, this work proposes a bioinspired distributed architecture for an Internet of Things that exhibits self-organization properties to enable efficient interaction between entities modeled as cyber-physical systems, mainly focusing on sensor networks. Furthermore, a middleware has been implemented according to the proposed architecture, which serves the role of the backbone of this network as a multiagent and autonomous distributed system. The evaluation results demonstrate the self-optimization properties of the introduced scheme and indicate global network convergence.

show abstract

Section: Architectural Issues In the Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Architecting the IoT Paradigm: A Middleware for Autonomous Distributed Sensor Networks

Eleftherakis¹,

Pappas

Λάγκας³

et al. 2015

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After retrieving this list, the requestor directly contacts the EPCIS in which she is interested. While Discovery Services are still in the development phase (see [34] for a current overview on designs), the ONS standard has been published and ratified [30]. According to the standard, the ONS is organized as a distributed hierarchical database, very much resembling the architecture of the Domain Naming Services (DNS).…”

Section: The Epcglobal Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

RFID and the Internet of Things: Technology, Applications, and Security Challenges

Evdokimov

2010

FNT in Technology, Information and Operations Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Multiple discovery architectures were already proposed in the literature [6,7], but they assume that devices offer their data publicly by the very act of registering to the discovery services. There is no mechanism that would allow device owner to specify the amount of money per measurement for which he would be willing to share sensor readings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%