2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1995-7645(13)60138-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct fecal smear microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Blastocystis sp. in human stool samples

Abstract: In this study, in vitro culture is the best method for detecting Blastocystis sp. in human stool samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
14
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in vitro culture of Blastocystis spp. as well as nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using DNA extracted from human stool samples have been described to generally display more positive cases than direct microscopy or standard PCR [31][32]. Also, the controversial results observed among different studies (including the present study) might be due to the presence of pathogenic and non-pathogenic genotypes.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Indeed, in vitro culture of Blastocystis spp. as well as nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using DNA extracted from human stool samples have been described to generally display more positive cases than direct microscopy or standard PCR [31][32]. Also, the controversial results observed among different studies (including the present study) might be due to the presence of pathogenic and non-pathogenic genotypes.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This study determined the prevalence of Blastocystis using culture and light microscopy techniques and its association with various factors using univariate and multivariate analyses. Culture method was preferred because of its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to direct fecal smear microscopy [ 27 ] and stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [ 28 , 29 ]. Santos and Rivera [ 28 ] considered in vitro culture as the gold standard in detecting Blastocystis cells and reported sensitivity of the following methods: 19.4% for direct fecal smear method, 19.4% for PCR from stool, and 66.7% for PCR from Blastocystis culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture method was preferred because of its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to direct fecal smear microscopy [ 27 ] and stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [ 28 , 29 ]. Santos and Rivera [ 28 ] considered in vitro culture as the gold standard in detecting Blastocystis cells and reported sensitivity of the following methods: 19.4% for direct fecal smear method, 19.4% for PCR from stool, and 66.7% for PCR from Blastocystis culture. However, in vitro culture is a selective technique; it is affected by the composition of medium used and the protocol applied in cultivation [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated studies have shown that the overall positivity of routine microscopy and culture of stool samples from symptomatic individuals are poor compared to conventional PCR. Selected references in the reference list demonstrate this finding (Morgan, Paillart, & Thompson, 1998;Santos & Rivera, 2013;Stensvold & Nielsen, 2012). The need for comprehensive screening assays in both outbreak settings and routine clinical investigation has therefore been recognised and the latter developed and used in a number of settings (Liu et al, 2013(Liu et al, , 2014Pholwat et al, 2015).…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Tacsmentioning
confidence: 99%