2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct and indirect natural draft dry cooling tower cooling of the sCO2 Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beside novel structure, some novel heat transfer fluid is also applied for the solar receiver and solar thermal power. Duniam et al [30] proposed the sCO 2 Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power plants, and sCO 2 can be an important heat transfer fluid for the receiver, heat exchange and power cycle. Guo et al [31] analyzed the thermodynamic performance CO 2 -based binary mixtures within the molten salt solar power tower system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside novel structure, some novel heat transfer fluid is also applied for the solar receiver and solar thermal power. Duniam et al [30] proposed the sCO 2 Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power plants, and sCO 2 can be an important heat transfer fluid for the receiver, heat exchange and power cycle. Guo et al [31] analyzed the thermodynamic performance CO 2 -based binary mixtures within the molten salt solar power tower system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model was validated using the experimental results published by Adebiyi and Hall which is close to the value of interest for large size FTHEs designs [50]. The sCO2 inlet temperature is 15.4℃ (referring to test case 1.2 in Table 3-2).…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For the simulations for the two other tube diameters of 15.75 mm and 24.36 mm, the generated meshes maintain this same approximate + value. solar power plant [50]. This value is also located within the mass flux range that is applicable to most sCO2 heat exchanger (gas coolers) designs [22,24,33,38,39,194,205].…”
Section: Appropriateness Of Simulation Tool To Sco2 Cooling and Grid mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations