2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prediction of prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jung et al found that K trans was the most signi cant parameter for distinguishing high-and lowgrade gliomas [16]. Another study found mean K trans is higher in breast cancer with high histologic than that in breast cancer with low histologic grade [17]. In this study, we did not nd that Kep and Ve were related to the differentiation of rectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Jung et al found that K trans was the most signi cant parameter for distinguishing high-and lowgrade gliomas [16]. Another study found mean K trans is higher in breast cancer with high histologic than that in breast cancer with low histologic grade [17]. In this study, we did not nd that Kep and Ve were related to the differentiation of rectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…MK can evaluate the extent to which the water molecules with the diffusion displacement distribution deviate from the Gaussian function, reflecting the complexity of the tissue microstructure, the more complex the tissue structure of the selected ROI, the more restricted the water molecules have in their diffusion, and the larger the MK. [6,[14][15][16] According to the results of previous [10,14,17] studies in the literature, The ADC and MD values of the benign lesions were higher than the malignant lesions, and The MK values were higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions, data from the current study showed that, The ADC value and MD of the benign lesions of the 2 test subjects, which were 1.63 ± 0.5210 to 3 m m2/seconds and 1.54 ± 0.4510 to 3 mm2/seconds, respectively; 2.23 ± 0.37 × 10 to 3 mm2/seconds, 2.21 ± 0.37 × 10 to 3 mm2/seconds, The ADC values and MD values of the malignant lesions were 1.27 ± 0.4510 to 3 mm2/seconds, and 1.27 ± 0.4510 to 3 mm2/seconds, respectively; 1.86 ± 0.54 × 10 to 3 mm2/seconds, 1.79 ± 0.52 × 10 to 3 mm2/seconds, The MK values for benign lesions were 0.46 ± 0.25 and 0.46 ± 0.24, The MK values for the malignant lesions were 0.67 ± 0.19 and 0.59 ± 0.23, Consistent with previous literature reports. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of MK, MD, and ADC values in malignant breast lesions were all evaluated using the ROC curves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung et al found that K trans was the most significant parameter for distinguishing high- and low-grade gliomas [ 16 ]. Another study found mean K trans is higher in breast cancer with high histologic than that in breast cancer with low histologic grade [ 17 ]. In this study, we did not find that Kep and Ve were related to the differentiation of rectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%