2013
DOI: 10.1177/230949901302100204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Warfarin Reversal Protocols on Surgical Delay and Complication Rate in Hip Fracture Patients

Abstract: purpose. To compare the effects of different warfarin reversal protocols on surgical delay and complication rate in hip fracture patients. Methods. Records of 7 men and 17 women aged 68 to 93 (mean, 82) years who were on warfarin and underwent surgery for femoral neck fractures were reviewed. The time to surgery, complication rate, and mortality were recorded, as were the International Normalised Ratio (INR) on admission and the day of operation, as well as the dose, route, and time of administration of vitami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is firm evidence both for the requirement of protocols in hip fracture care, the morbidity associated with delays to theater in patients with hip fracture on warfarin, and the benefits of IVK administration. 11,12,14,15,[28][29][30][31] In particular, Leonidou et al found that IVK administration resulted in not only a decreased delay to theater but also the lowest rate of complications. 30 It is appropriate that any broad protocol-driven path of care should be met with a degree of concern, but for the early administration of IVK in the warfarinized population with hip fracture, the wealth of evidence supports its safe and beneficial use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is firm evidence both for the requirement of protocols in hip fracture care, the morbidity associated with delays to theater in patients with hip fracture on warfarin, and the benefits of IVK administration. 11,12,14,15,[28][29][30][31] In particular, Leonidou et al found that IVK administration resulted in not only a decreased delay to theater but also the lowest rate of complications. 30 It is appropriate that any broad protocol-driven path of care should be met with a degree of concern, but for the early administration of IVK in the warfarinized population with hip fracture, the wealth of evidence supports its safe and beneficial use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spontaneous reversal of anticoagulation by temporary warfarin cessation takes several days. As warfarin acts as a vitamin K antagonist, the reversal of anticoagulation is achieved more rapidly with the concomitant administration of oral vitamin K [7, 16, 17]. If 1 mg of oral vitamin K is given 24 h before surgery, an INR ratio can be normalized in some patients and correlates with short duration of bridging therapy [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of today, there are no widely accepted guidelines for pharmacologic reversal of warfarin in patients requiring hip fracture surgery. Some authors suggested administration of vitamin K as a safe, effective, and cost-efficient method of reversing warfarin in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery [1,[5][6][7][8]. However, the ideal dosage, dosing schedule, and route of administration (oral versus subcutaneous or intravenous) remain unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches for warfarin reversal in patients with hip fracture have been suggested [1,2,[5][6][7][8]10]. Available options include prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and vitamin K [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%