2020
DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.684951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different U-Net Models for Building Extraction from High-Resolution Aerial Imagery

Abstract: International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics (ISAG2019) was held in Istanbul on 7-9 November 2019. The symposium is organized with the aim of promoting the advancements to explore the latest scientific and technological developments and opportunities in the field of Geoinformatics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the recognition process does not require significant computing resources at the stage of using the model. Compared to [21], this model has a 3 % higher precision of object recognition in images. That was achieved by adding data layers, converting, normalizing data, error, calculating the mean error and parameters to complement the data, as well as FCN, and deleting layers of input/output data, and layer pooling.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Of Studying the Recognition Of Objects In Images Using Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the recognition process does not require significant computing resources at the stage of using the model. Compared to [21], this model has a 3 % higher precision of object recognition in images. That was achieved by adding data layers, converting, normalizing data, error, calculating the mean error and parameters to complement the data, as well as FCN, and deleting layers of input/output data, and layer pooling.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Of Studying the Recognition Of Objects In Images Using Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the comparison was carried out according to the criterion for assessing mean accuracy estimate with some well-known GoogLeNet-based models, developed according to similar parameters, trained on the basis of images acquired from UAV cameras. GoogLeNet-like (Switzerland), In-ceptionResNetV2 (Turkey), U-Net Inception-ResNetV2 (Turkey) were chosen as such models [20,21]. The results of assessing the mean accuracy of the models are given in Table 8.…”
Section: Assessing the Inria-9 Trained Model For Object Recognition In Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supervised classification is used more often due to its high accuracy and reliability (Kavzoglu and Colkesen, 2010). Nonparametric classification methods such as decision tree (Nagel Yuan, 2016;(Zhang et al, 2018), support vector machines (Kavzoglu and Colkesen, 2009;Zhang et al, 2018;Karimi et al, 2019) and artificial neural networks (Hu and Weng, 2009;Mohapatra and Wu, 2010) can be used to classify remotely sensed images (Lu, et al, 2007;Çelik and Gazioğlu, 2020;Tonbul and Kavzoğlu, 2020;Erdem and Avdan;2020;Ozturk et al, 2020;Karagöl et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing data and techniques have been successfully used for building information extraction [5], and post-earthquake evaluation of collapsed buildings [6]. Also, high-resolution imagery from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in combination with elevation models [7] for extracting building inventory information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%