1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02513024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different techniques for gene transfer into mature and immature tobacco pollen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the values in our present study are 1 order of magnitude higher than those reported with a pollen-specific PA2 promoter in tobacco (Stoger et al, 1992) and N. glutinosa (Plegt et al, 1992) pollen.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the values in our present study are 1 order of magnitude higher than those reported with a pollen-specific PA2 promoter in tobacco (Stoger et al, 1992) and N. glutinosa (Plegt et al, 1992) pollen.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Note that the observed GUS activity with the CaMV 355 promoter did not differ greatly between lily and tobacco pollen. These values of GUS activity with the CaMV 35s promoter were smaller than those (1.4-1.9 pmol 4-MU h-' pg-' protein) reported for pollen grains of tobacco (Stoger et al, 1992) and Tradescantia (Hamilton et al, 1992). GUS activity in tobacco pollen observed here with the LAT52 promoter is about one-tenth of that observed with this promoter in pollen of transgenic tobacco plants (Twell et al, 1989a).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fluorimetrical and histochemical GUS assays were carried out as described by Jefferson (22) and Stoger et al. (23). Under the conditions used, no endogenous GUS activity was detected in either assay (ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%