2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20061663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops

Abstract: This paper reviews the use of modern 3D image-based and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) methods of surface reconstruction techniques for high fidelity surveys of small rock outcrops to highlight their potential within structural geology and landscape protection. LiDAR and Structure from Motion (SfM) software provide useful opportunities for rock outcrops mapping and 3D model creation. The accuracy of these surface reconstructions is crucial for quantitative structural analysis. However, these technologies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the establishment of the 3D HRPC model described previously, the model was analyzed to identify the main characteristics of the rock mass structure, such as the detection and mapping of the discontinuities and discontinuity sets, orientation and dip of discontinuities, spacing of discontinuities, persistence of discontinuities, and roughness of discontinues, as well as determination of rock block volumes. Due to the increasing use of UAV photogrammetry and the SfM technique to create 3D HRPC models, various automatic and semi-automatic techniques and methods have been developed to detect and map the discontinuities and discontinuity sets [20,[22][23][24][25][26]28,31,, orientation and dip direction of discontinuities [18,20,22,23,26,28,29,31,[37][38][39][40][42][43][44][45]48,49,[54][55][56][57][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]…”
Section: In Situ and Remote Sensing Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the establishment of the 3D HRPC model described previously, the model was analyzed to identify the main characteristics of the rock mass structure, such as the detection and mapping of the discontinuities and discontinuity sets, orientation and dip of discontinuities, spacing of discontinuities, persistence of discontinuities, and roughness of discontinues, as well as determination of rock block volumes. Due to the increasing use of UAV photogrammetry and the SfM technique to create 3D HRPC models, various automatic and semi-automatic techniques and methods have been developed to detect and map the discontinuities and discontinuity sets [20,[22][23][24][25][26]28,31,, orientation and dip direction of discontinuities [18,20,22,23,26,28,29,31,[37][38][39][40][42][43][44][45]48,49,[54][55][56][57][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]…”
Section: In Situ and Remote Sensing Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors were originally used to improve the quality of photos (e.g., improved camera focus, bokeh effect, etc.) and to enable augmented reality applications, but they proved to be suitable for scientific purposes [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data could be collected using portable cameras or cameras attached to an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [27]. With recent advancements in photogrammetry algorithms and computer vision automated methods, the processing pipeline has developed into a robust and valuable solution for 3D reconstruction [28]. The main challenge with the available automated software is the significant constraints on the quality of required images and camera network [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%