2015
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1084438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different regression models and validation techniques for the assessment of wheat leaf area index from hyperspectral data

Abstract: Leaf area index (LAI) is one of the most important plant parameters when observing agricultural crops and a decisive factor for yield estimates. Remote-sensing data provide spectral information on large areas and allow for a detailed quantitative assessment of LAI and other plant parameters. The present study compared support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), and partial least-squares regression (PLSR) and their achieved model qualities for the assessment of LAI from wheat reflectance sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are reasonable because the SVR model has proven robust and efficient with small datasets [92,93]. This result is in agreement with the findings reported in References [94][95][96][97], which concluded that SVR consistently outperformed other machine learning methods. The performance (R 2 of 0.73 and RMSE of 38.68 Mg·ha −1 , Table 7) of the SVR model with the combination data of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 indicates a satisfactory result compared to previous studies on the forest AGB, as seen in Reference [98] (R 2 = 0.46), (R 2 = 0.28-0.44) [21], and (R 2 = 0.46) [99].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results are reasonable because the SVR model has proven robust and efficient with small datasets [92,93]. This result is in agreement with the findings reported in References [94][95][96][97], which concluded that SVR consistently outperformed other machine learning methods. The performance (R 2 of 0.73 and RMSE of 38.68 Mg·ha −1 , Table 7) of the SVR model with the combination data of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 indicates a satisfactory result compared to previous studies on the forest AGB, as seen in Reference [98] (R 2 = 0.46), (R 2 = 0.28-0.44) [21], and (R 2 = 0.46) [99].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Both methods are commonly used in remote sensing (e.g., Baret et al, 2009;Siegmann and Jarmer, 2015). The NN method was used for development of the LAI product of future space systems (Baret et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the PRESS statistic through a leaveone-out cross-validation approach, which trains the model on all but one observation and then makes a prediction for the left-out observation. The average error is then computed and used to evaluate the model (Siegmann and Jarmer, 2015). VIP scores (Wold, 1994) also were determined to compare the relative significance of each wavelength in its contribution to the final model.…”
Section: Plsr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%