Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS

Abstract

It has been known that the first generation quantitative coronary analysis systems overestimate small vessel sizes. In the 2nd generation the contour detection algorithms, e.g., of the new Cardiovascular Measurement System (CMS), were modified to correct for the limited resolution of the X-ray imaging chain. This study validated and compared the CMS with the well-known Coronary Angiography Analysis System (CAAS) and the vessel tracking program ARTREK in a phantom study and a clinical study. In addition, the influence of different acquisition media (cinefilm vs. digitally acquired angiograms) on the accuracy of quantitative analysis was examined. The phantom study comprised 19 stenotic or non-stenotic glass tubes with a diameter range from 0.54 mm to 4.9 mm. In the clinical study the mean diameters of 322 coronary segments were analysed and the results of the systems were compared among each other. The results of the phantom study were presented in terms of the mean difference (accuracy) between true and measured values. In the phantom study the overall accuracy of the CMS was -6 pm (ARTREK: 85 pm; CAAS: 35 pm) with an overestimation of small vessels of only -11 pm (ARTREK: 97 pm: CAAS: 51 pm). The clinical study showed that the CMS corrected the usually occurring overestimation of small coronary arteries and that the influence on the accuracy of different acquisition media is minor. Due to the modified algorithms the new CMS is able to measure coronary diameters down to 0.5 mm accurately. Therefore, the CMS seems to provide more precise measurements in quantitative analysis of small coronary diameters than CAAS and ARTREK.

Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function Early After Heart Transplantation is Associated with Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

“…This has been shown to provide precise measurements in quantitative analysis of coronary diameters (21).…”

Effects of Intravenous Nesiritide on Human Coronary Vasomotor Regulation and Myocardial Oxygen Uptake

“…Analysis was performed offline following the procedures using the Camtronics ARTREK QCA algorithm. 10 QCA analysis determined the diameter and cross-sectional area of the mid coronary artery 5 mm distal to the tip of the FloWire in the sample volume site.…”

Angiographic Classification of Coronary Dissections after Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for Prediction of Regression at Follow-up.

“…Qualitative analysis of the lesions was carefully performed based on standardized criteria for preprocedural lesion morphology, 19,21) and the lesions were also classified according to the modified ACC/ AHA classification. 22) QCA (CMS, MEDIS, edge detection method), which had been validated elsewhere, 23) was used to evaluate the initial and long-term results of POBA. Lesion length (shoulder to shoulder), reference diameter, and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were measured immediately before POBA and immediately after POBA, and an average of 5.3 months after POBA.…”