2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different quantification methods to determine hippocampal damage after cerebral ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore results are likely to differ between both methods, depending on the time at which brains were harvested after the insult. Such differences between staining methods have been reported previously, although in different models (33,34). The trend in the CV staining show in the same direction as the FJB staining, which supports our results.…”
Section: The P53 Protein and Its Products Have A Central Role In Apopsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore results are likely to differ between both methods, depending on the time at which brains were harvested after the insult. Such differences between staining methods have been reported previously, although in different models (33,34). The trend in the CV staining show in the same direction as the FJB staining, which supports our results.…”
Section: The P53 Protein and Its Products Have A Central Role In Apopsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results indicated that within first 24 hr of reperfusion, the registered decrease in NeuN staining was not statistically significant. According to the literature, immunostaining for NeuN that detected loss of CA1 neurons in hippocampus occurs 2-4 days after global cerebral ischaemia [45,46] while Zhou et al [47] did not find significant CA1 neuronal loss within 10 weeks after 2-hr MCAO in comparison with the control animals. In conclusion, within first 24 hr after 1-hr MCAO, there was no significant neuronal loss of the hippocampal tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then asked if this defective glial scar development affects surrounding neurons. Loss of NeuN indicates degenerating neurons (Alekseeva et al, 2015), and its translocation from the nucleus to the cytosol identifies neurons exhibiting an initial stress response to pathologies (Lucas et al, 2014;Shandra et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2015;Wiley et al, 2016). Following stab injury, WT brains consistently maintained NeuN in the neuronal nuclei irrespective of their position relative to the injury site.…”
Section: Reactive Astrocytes Require Dbn To Form Glia Scars In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%