2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different physical models for PV power output prediction

Abstract: 12The electricity produced from renewable energy, in particular from wind and photovoltaic plants, has seen exponential rise in the last 13 decade. Consequently, the prediction of power produced from these plants is fundamental for the reliability, safety and stability of the 14 grid. This paper compares three physical models describing the PV cell (corresponding to three-, four-and five-parameter equivalent 15 electric circuit) and two thermal models for the cell temperature estimation (NOCT and Sandia). The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PV module I-V curve is calculated combining the I-V curves of each cell and the I-V curves of each bypass diode in order to comply with the series and parallel electrical connection constraints. The I-V curve of each cell was calculated by using the five parameter mathematical model [26], whose equivalent circuit is reported in Figure 5. The five parameters that characterize this model are the light generated current (I PV ), the leakage or reverse saturation current (I 0 ), the diode quality factor (n), the series resistance (R s ) and the shunt resistance (R sh ).…”
Section: Test Case Pv System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PV module I-V curve is calculated combining the I-V curves of each cell and the I-V curves of each bypass diode in order to comply with the series and parallel electrical connection constraints. The I-V curve of each cell was calculated by using the five parameter mathematical model [26], whose equivalent circuit is reported in Figure 5. The five parameters that characterize this model are the light generated current (I PV ), the leakage or reverse saturation current (I 0 ), the diode quality factor (n), the series resistance (R s ) and the shunt resistance (R sh ).…”
Section: Test Case Pv System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though it may seem to be less feasible for countries with cloudy weather, PV technology has relatively significant use in European countries like Germany. In 2014, there is about 177 GW of power from solar panels [57][58][59][60]. Katsumata et al (2011) [63] illustrated that exposing PV cells to high intensity irradiance accompanied with high temperature for long period of time may affect its performance, which is mainly based on geographical areas and the changing weather was either urban, rural, or desert areas.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolara et al [43] investigated the PV power output prediction using three mathematical models and considered both poly-crystalline and mono-crystalline PV module. Dolara et al [44] and Leva et al [45] investigated the P V power output prediction using neural network and hybrid model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%