2020 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2020 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Syst 2020
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic/icpseurope49358.2020.9160791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Photovoltaic Perturb and Observe Algorithms for Drift Avoidance in Fluctuating Irradiance Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this, some modified P&O algorithms have been presented in the literature. Among them, dP-P&O algorithm [17] shows the best performance under variable irradiance conditions [21]. The novelty of the dP-P&O algorithm compared with the conventional P&O algorithm is introduced in the calculation of DP pv , denoted as dP.…”
Section: Startmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this, some modified P&O algorithms have been presented in the literature. Among them, dP-P&O algorithm [17] shows the best performance under variable irradiance conditions [21]. The novelty of the dP-P&O algorithm compared with the conventional P&O algorithm is introduced in the calculation of DP pv , denoted as dP.…”
Section: Startmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table II summarizes the novelties of the proposed methodology in contrast to [20] and [21]. The authors recently compared the above mentioned algorithms in [27] through traditional switching modeling and with real field irradiance conditions. This paper presents an extension of [27], being the main contributions described below: 1) A methodology for systematically evaluate the performance of PV MPPT algorithms is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors recently compared the above mentioned algorithms in [27] through traditional switching modeling and with real field irradiance conditions. This paper presents an extension of [27], being the main contributions described below: 1) A methodology for systematically evaluate the performance of PV MPPT algorithms is proposed. This procedure aims to unify the different simulation settings available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the problems of the conventional P&O MPPT technique also, is the drift phenomenon where the algorithm can't distingue between power incrementation caused by the perturbation applied or by a wind speed increase 28 . Many solutions and modified P&O algorithms were proposed to solve that problem 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Many solutions and modified P&O algorithms were proposed to solve that problem. 29 Mishra et al 26 have used a modified P&O MPPT algorithm, with a fixed step size for the duty cycle variation, where theoretical analysis confirms that, only in speed increase condition, the change in dc-link current sign can be positive, so, the dc-link current change information was included, to detect the wind speed increase and follow the correct direction of power change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%