1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002160050765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different methods for the determination of the water content and the dry mass correction factor in various plant samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of these organic compounds during drying can result in a discrepancy in the calculated pigment concentrations based on either the FM or DM calculations and has been attributed to a dilution effect (Lefsrud et al, 2006(Lefsrud et al, , 2007. Karathanos (1999) and Stegen et al (1998) reported decreases in %DM when oven drying temperatures were greater than +65°C. Karathanos (1999) suggested that the decrease in %DM was the result of decomposition of low-molecular-weight sugars during water evaporation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of these organic compounds during drying can result in a discrepancy in the calculated pigment concentrations based on either the FM or DM calculations and has been attributed to a dilution effect (Lefsrud et al, 2006(Lefsrud et al, , 2007. Karathanos (1999) and Stegen et al (1998) reported decreases in %DM when oven drying temperatures were greater than +65°C. Karathanos (1999) suggested that the decrease in %DM was the result of decomposition of low-molecular-weight sugars during water evaporation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potato and broad bean skin was removed with a quartz knife, since it is sometimes consumed. Water content and the mass correction factor were determined by freeze-drying because water determination by an oven is not recommended for beans and their skin 35 . Water content values were in the 72-79 % range for potatoes, 81-86% for potato skin (pskin), 78 a 80% for broad bean, 92-90% for broad bean skin (bskin) and 75-83% for maize, depending on the sampling site.…”
Section: Sampling and Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%