2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different methods for determination of drip loss and their relationships to meat quality and carcass characteristics in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
73
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
73
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor2 connected a low fatness to a high protein content and to the toughness of the cooked meat, while Factor3 linked a high fatness to a low moisture content and a high cooking loss. The associations found in Factor1 are consistent with the literature: Otto et al (2004) and Ros-Freixedes et al (2014) found that the drip loss was negatively correlated with the pH 24 and positively correlated with L* and b*; Lee et al (2000) and D'Alessandro et al (2011) reported a correlation between the increase in the ultimate pH and the decrease of the drip loss and the L* value; Van der Wal et al (1995) observed a negative relationship between the pH 20 and the drip loss, cooking loss and L* value. No confirmation was found in the literature for the associations expressed by the other two factors, at least in a multivariate analysis system, but it is notable that the high IMF content was associated separately with the low content of the other principal chemical components (moisture and protein).…”
Section: Diet Protein and Meat Traits In Cinta Senese Pigssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Factor2 connected a low fatness to a high protein content and to the toughness of the cooked meat, while Factor3 linked a high fatness to a low moisture content and a high cooking loss. The associations found in Factor1 are consistent with the literature: Otto et al (2004) and Ros-Freixedes et al (2014) found that the drip loss was negatively correlated with the pH 24 and positively correlated with L* and b*; Lee et al (2000) and D'Alessandro et al (2011) reported a correlation between the increase in the ultimate pH and the decrease of the drip loss and the L* value; Van der Wal et al (1995) observed a negative relationship between the pH 20 and the drip loss, cooking loss and L* value. No confirmation was found in the literature for the associations expressed by the other two factors, at least in a multivariate analysis system, but it is notable that the high IMF content was associated separately with the low content of the other principal chemical components (moisture and protein).…”
Section: Diet Protein and Meat Traits In Cinta Senese Pigssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect was similar for Landrace and Duroc (data not shown in tables). This physiological relationship has been found earlier, both in pigs (Christensen, 2003;Otto et al, 2004) and in cattle (Hoset, 2008).…”
Section: Heritabilitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to Rasmussen and Andersson (1996) who developed the EZ-DripLoss method, it is easier to use in an abattoir setting in a reproducible way. This was supported by Otto et al (2004), who confirmed that the method has high sensitivity and estimated a correlation of 0.86 between the two drip loss methods.…”
Section: Heritabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drip loss of chicken thigh meat samples was measured using the bag method as described by Otto (2004). After marination, a slice of preweighed (approximately 25 g) chicken thigh was hung in a plastic bag and allowed to stand for 2 days at 4ºC.…”
Section: Drip Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%