2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13091227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Magnesium Hydroxide Coatings Applied on Concrete Substrates (Sewer Pipes) for Protection against Bio-Corrosion

Abstract: Several coatings and linings have been examined and used for the protection of sewer concrete pipes, against mainly biogenic-provoked corrosion due to the production of bio-sulfuric acid, leading to the degradation of the pipes’ structure and eventually, to their collapse and need for costly replacement. This study aimed to examine the potential differences between five different magnesium hydroxide coatings, prepared from powders presenting different purity, surface area and pore size distribution, when appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total mass loss at 1000 • C (i.e., the Loss on Ignition, LOI) corresponds to all the water and CO 2 content of the respective powder. This magnesium hydroxide differs mainly in the MgO content, but also in the specific surface area and in the particle size from other examined magnesium hydroxides, previously investigated [28]. The main difference regards the specific surface area, which is very low in this case (7 m 2 /g) to maintain favorable slurry characteristics, such as viscosity and workability and to allow the inclusion of cellulose.…”
Section: Magnesium Hydroxide Slurrymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The total mass loss at 1000 • C (i.e., the Loss on Ignition, LOI) corresponds to all the water and CO 2 content of the respective powder. This magnesium hydroxide differs mainly in the MgO content, but also in the specific surface area and in the particle size from other examined magnesium hydroxides, previously investigated [28]. The main difference regards the specific surface area, which is very low in this case (7 m 2 /g) to maintain favorable slurry characteristics, such as viscosity and workability and to allow the inclusion of cellulose.…”
Section: Magnesium Hydroxide Slurrymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The main difference regards the specific surface area, which is very low in this case (7 m 2 /g) to maintain favorable slurry characteristics, such as viscosity and workability and to allow the inclusion of cellulose. The results of the previous study [28] indicate that the bigger particle size may lead to slower interactions with the respective (acidic) environment. In that way, this magnesium hydroxide has finer particles, than other examined relevant hydroxides [28].…”
Section: Magnesium Hydroxide Slurrymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations