1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.9492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different ladder models

Abstract: Using density matrix renormalization group calculations, we compare results obtained for the t-J, one-band Hubbard and three-band Hubbard models of a two-leg CuO ladder. Spin and charge gaps, pair binding energies, and effective pair hoppings are calculated for a wide range of parameters. All three models have an insulating state at a filling corresponding to one hole per Cu site. For physically relevant parameters their spin gaps are similar in size but they exhibit quite different charge gaps. We find that t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

8
68
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RPA calculations for the three-band Hubbard model have also found nematic phases in certain parameter regimes [31][32][33] . Earlier DMRG calculations for a 3-orbital model of a two-leg CuO 2 ladder showed the expected local asymmetric chargetransfer behavior in which doped holes tend to predominantly go on the 2pσ orbitals while doped electrons go on the Cu 3d x 2 −y 2 orbitals 34,35 . These calculations also found d x 2 −y 2 -like pairing correlations for both hole and electron doping in which the near neighbor Cu rung and leg pair-field correlations differ in sign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPA calculations for the three-band Hubbard model have also found nematic phases in certain parameter regimes [31][32][33] . Earlier DMRG calculations for a 3-orbital model of a two-leg CuO 2 ladder showed the expected local asymmetric chargetransfer behavior in which doped holes tend to predominantly go on the 2pσ orbitals while doped electrons go on the Cu 3d x 2 −y 2 orbitals 34,35 . These calculations also found d x 2 −y 2 -like pairing correlations for both hole and electron doping in which the near neighbor Cu rung and leg pair-field correlations differ in sign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in the t − J model, while J/t can be set to a physical value, one has in effect an infinite onsite Coulomb repulsion arising from the restriction of no double occupancy. The suppression of double occupancy reduces the mobility of the pairs, [17] missing the physics associated with the partial occupation of the O sites surrounding a Cu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focus on the issue of whether their presence causes any significant changes 11 and in particular whether orbital phases might exist for realistic choices of microscopic interactions, for ␦ 0. 12 We establish, in the weak coupling regime, the phase diagram as a function of hole doping of two-leg ladders whose unit cell contains both Cu and O at- Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%