2020
DOI: 10.25002/tji.2020.1157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods in the Detection of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies and Their Diagnostic Utility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…95%).Therefore, the results of CLIFT and ANA-IB had a high correlation coefficient (p=0.002, r=0.90). 8 The Korean team of "Yang JY et al" evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection including CLIFT and Immunoblot IB on 142 sera. The results of these two techniques were concordant in 53.8% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…95%).Therefore, the results of CLIFT and ANA-IB had a high correlation coefficient (p=0.002, r=0.90). 8 The Korean team of "Yang JY et al" evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection including CLIFT and Immunoblot IB on 142 sera. The results of these two techniques were concordant in 53.8% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA and immunoblot techniques are also used for verification and quantification. 8 In our study, we sought to compare CLIFT with Immunoblot to evaluate its performance in the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%