2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different interpolation methods and sequential Gaussian simulation to estimate volumes of soil contaminated by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and dioxins/furans

Abstract: Comparison of different interpolation methods and sequential Gaussian simulation to estimate volumes of soil contaminated by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and dioxins/furans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The map produced by the OK method smoothed out most of the local details. These findings were consistent with those of previous studies [82][83][84]. In the PTE estimation results produced by the EBK algorithm, we detected a more dramatic PTE variation in the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Prediction Accuracy Using Different Interpolation Mesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The map produced by the OK method smoothed out most of the local details. These findings were consistent with those of previous studies [82][83][84]. In the PTE estimation results produced by the EBK algorithm, we detected a more dramatic PTE variation in the study area.…”
Section: Spatial Prediction Accuracy Using Different Interpolation Mesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For runoff simulation of the entire basin, satellite‐based dataset TRMM 3B42V7 reflects the characteristics of clouds over the region and it is not restricted by topographic fluctuations (Zhao, & Yatagai, 2014). In regions like the Hengduan Mountain, the highly heterogeneous topography limits the performance of meteorological station measurements in valleys and the excessive smoothing of the interpolation method itself will also result in generally low or high estimates (Metahni et al, 2019). These inaccuracies will lead to errors in runoff simulation, since runoff is greatly affected by surface precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For confidentiality reasons, soil samples are only identified as coming from an industrial area and are refered to as S3. The industrial activity generated a spatially heterogeneous soil contamination by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and PCDD/F (Metahni et al, 2019). Sampling was conducted on the first 0 to 15 cm depth interval over an area of 16 m 2 (4 m x 4 m).…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was conducted on the first 0 to 15 cm depth interval over an area of 16 m 2 (4 m x 4 m). This area was chosen because of its high PCDD/F contamination, based on a previous sampling campaign completed in November of 2014 (Metahni et al, 2019). This sampling campaign, revealed initial PCDD/F levels of 6,678 -11,322 and 12,625 ng dioxin toxicity equivalence (ng TEQ/kg), for exploration holes of 1 m 2 each (1 m x 1 m) located in the area of interest.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%