2019
DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Criteria in the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Students From Paranavaí, Paraná

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the difference in the proportion of students with metabolic syndrome, diagnosed according to different criteria.Methods: The sample consisted of 241 students (136 boys and 105 girls) aged 10 to 14 years, from public and private schools in Paranavaí, Paraná. We used three distinct diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome, considering the presence of at least three of the following risk factors: increased waist circumference, hypertension, fasting hyperglycemia, low HDL-C, and elevate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tavares Giannini et al 34 also reported confirmed a low kappa value ( κ = .48) for the agreement between the IDF and Ferranti et al 9 criteria. However, the study carried out by Guilherme et al 4 in Brazilian adolescents reported good agreement between the IDF criteria with the criteria proposed by Cook et al 6 and Ferranti et al, 9 κ = .950 and κ = .670, respectively. This variability on the degree of agreement in the aforementioned studies was also observed in the study by Peña‐Espinoza et al, 27 where kappa values were .700 and .353 between the IDF criteria and the criteria of Cook et al 6 and De Ferranti et al, 9 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tavares Giannini et al 34 also reported confirmed a low kappa value ( κ = .48) for the agreement between the IDF and Ferranti et al 9 criteria. However, the study carried out by Guilherme et al 4 in Brazilian adolescents reported good agreement between the IDF criteria with the criteria proposed by Cook et al 6 and Ferranti et al, 9 κ = .950 and κ = .670, respectively. This variability on the degree of agreement in the aforementioned studies was also observed in the study by Peña‐Espinoza et al, 27 where kappa values were .700 and .353 between the IDF criteria and the criteria of Cook et al 6 and De Ferranti et al, 9 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…On the other hand, the prevalence of MetS in adolescence in many studies is rather divergent, mainly due to the absence of specifically established criteria for its use in non‐adult populations. This situation often involves adapting criteria to define MetS in adults to be used in adolescents 4 . This is the case of the criteria established by the National Cholesterol Education Program ‐ Adult Treatment Panel III, 5 modified by Cook et al, 6 Weiss et al, 7 Duncan et al, 8 and de Ferranti et al 9 The criteria defined by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 10 necessarily include the presence of abdominal obesity for the diagnosis of MetS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study for 2010; 17 two studies for each of 2011, 18,19 2013, 20,21 2016, 22,23 and 2017; 24,25 and three studies for 2018 [26][27][28] and 2019 [29][30][31] were retrieved. 23 Data from this study were extracted by Brazilian regions to determine the combined prevalence of MS in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MetS prevalence was low (2•6 %) and could be explained by the MetS definition proposed by the IDF, which requires the presence of high waist circumference to classify the individuals as the MetS patients (79) . In a small study performed with adolescents (n 241) from public and private schools in a Brazilian city (80) , the MetS prevalence ranged from 1•7 % (95 % CI 0•0, 3•3), using the IDF definition, to 17•4 % (95 % CI 12•6, 22•3), using a definition based on the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, modified for children and adolescents (81) . Another study (82) , enrolling adolescents (n 1004) from the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence study, compared the prevalence of the MetS using different definitions for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%