2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different CO2 liquefaction processes and exergoeconomic evaluation of integrated CO2 liquefaction and absorption refrigeration system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the exergy destruction rate ( Ė D ), exergy destruction ratio ( y k ), and exergy efficiency (ε) are required to conduct the exergoeconomic analysis. Other exergoeconomic parameters are defined as follows where c P,k and c F,k are the average cost over the product and fuel exergy unit, respectively. The exergy destruction cost rate, which is highly crucial for the decision making of system operation, can signify the important hidden cost of exergy destruction.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the exergy destruction rate ( Ė D ), exergy destruction ratio ( y k ), and exergy efficiency (ε) are required to conduct the exergoeconomic analysis. Other exergoeconomic parameters are defined as follows where c P,k and c F,k are the average cost over the product and fuel exergy unit, respectively. The exergy destruction cost rate, which is highly crucial for the decision making of system operation, can signify the important hidden cost of exergy destruction.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the exergy destruction rate (E ̇D), exergy destruction ratio (y k ), and exergy efficiency (ε) are required to conduct the exergoeconomic analysis. Other exergoeconomic parameters are defined as follows 73…”
Section: Cost Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic conditions of the streams in the integrated structure of liquid carbon dioxide, electricity, and medium pressure steam production using a molten carbonate fuel cell, a Linde-Hampson liquefaction plant, and a HSRG, are presented in Table 1. The validation of the several parameters of the Linde-Hampson liquefaction cycle in this paper with reference [18] is illustrated in Figure 3. The results of the simulation analysis with the HYSYS software show that the fuel cell performance coefficient, total cooling duty, and refrigeration energy differ from the evaluated values reported in the reference article by 2.07%, 0.604%, and 2.022%, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, liquid CO 2 can be used as a working fluid in energy storage structures [16,17]. Aliyon et al [18] investigated CO 2 liquefaction units by several methods, such as the utilization of the vapor compression refrigeration cycle, the water-ammonia absorption refrigeration unit, and the Linde-Hampson refrigeration cycles. The simulation results revealed that the performance coefficient was the lowest (0.537) for the water-ammonia absorption refrigeration unit and was the highest (2.617) for the compression refrigeration cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation