2005
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-005-0576-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Clean-Up Procedures for the Analysis of Deoxynivalenol in Cereal-Based Food and Validation of a Reliable HPLC Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, Scheme SI1). This result is in agreement with a previous report, which demonstrated that acetonitrile/water extraction led to a lower co-extraction of interfering matrix compounds than methanol/water solvent (Klötzel et al, 2005). The applicability of this immunosensor in breakfast cereal, already demonstrated with water extraction, was also confirmed with acetonitrile/water extraction; moreover, the use of a clean-up step did not lead to any significant improvement in respect of what obtained with unpurified extracts.…”
Section: Breakfast Cerealsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, Scheme SI1). This result is in agreement with a previous report, which demonstrated that acetonitrile/water extraction led to a lower co-extraction of interfering matrix compounds than methanol/water solvent (Klötzel et al, 2005). The applicability of this immunosensor in breakfast cereal, already demonstrated with water extraction, was also confirmed with acetonitrile/water extraction; moreover, the use of a clean-up step did not lead to any significant improvement in respect of what obtained with unpurified extracts.…”
Section: Breakfast Cerealsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The need to comply with this regulation has increased the interest in the development of robust and reliable instrumental analytical methods and rapid test systems for in-field application. Commonly used methods for trichothecene detection include separating techniques coupled to different detectors (Klötzel et al, 2005;Lattanzio et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the IAC (DONPrepm, R-Biopharm) and the Mycosepm method, we analyzed ten naturally contaminated samples with both methods [15,38] and determined the DON content by LC-MS/MS (Table 2). In all cases, we obtained significantly higher values (f = 2, p = 0.05%) using the IAC method.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Immunoaffinity And Mycosepm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Mycosepm columns are at the moment the best compromise for a rapid and effective clean-up of crude extracts in the analysis of trichothecenes. In the last few years, the application of immunoaffinity columns (IAC) has been a great success for several mycotoxins [8,15]. This purification is highly specific and yields very good recovery rates, but is only applicable to one toxin at a time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation