The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5861(03)00198-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different catalysts in the membrane-supported dehydrogenation of propane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silica derived membranes have proved to be stable for over 2000 h operating at 500°C [1] using dry gas mixtures, as well as for H 2 /CO 2 separation [2,3], dehydrogenation of propane [4][5][6] and cyclohexane [7,8], and H 2 separation from syngas generated in the water gas shift reaction [9,10] among several examples. Although pure silica has excellent thermal and chemical stability, they are hydrothermally unstable in the presence of steam [11,12], which is a major issue for the deployment of silica membranes for industrial applications involving wet gas separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silica derived membranes have proved to be stable for over 2000 h operating at 500°C [1] using dry gas mixtures, as well as for H 2 /CO 2 separation [2,3], dehydrogenation of propane [4][5][6] and cyclohexane [7,8], and H 2 separation from syngas generated in the water gas shift reaction [9,10] among several examples. Although pure silica has excellent thermal and chemical stability, they are hydrothermally unstable in the presence of steam [11,12], which is a major issue for the deployment of silica membranes for industrial applications involving wet gas separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, several industrially relevant partial oxidation reactions were investigated. Relevant studies were performed, for example, for the oxidative coupling of methane Diakov, Lafarga, and Varma, 2001 ;Tonkovich et al , 1996a ), for the partial oxidation of ethane (Al -Juaied, Coronas, Menendez, and Santamaria, 1995 ;Klose et al , 2004a ;Klose et al , 2003a ;Wang et al , 2006 ) and propane (Caro, 2006 ;Grabowski, 2006 ;Liebner et al , 2003 ;Ramos, Menendez, and Santamaria, 2000 ;Sch ä fer et al , 2003 ;Ziaka, Minet, and Tsotsis, 1993 ) and for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of butane (Alonso et al , 2001 ;Mallada et al , 2000b ;Tellez, Menendez, and Santamaria, 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a result of the hydrogen removal, coking is promoted and after ca. 2 h time on stream the olefin yield of the membrane reactor drops below that of the classical fixed bed (Schäfer et al, 2003). After an oxidative regeneration the activity and selectivity are restored completely.…”
Section: Zeolite Membranes In Membrane Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 91%