2023
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12060997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Antibiotic Regimes for Preventive Tooth Extractions in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract: In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is particularly recommended for patients who are not eligible for surgery or prefer non-surgical interventions. The study compared three antibiotic regimens for preventing MRONJ in patients undergoing tooth extractions while on antiresorptive therapy, finding no significant difference in MRONJ development among groups treated with intravenous antibiotics for 7 days, oral antibiotics for 14 days, or oral antibiotics for 7 days [61]. This indicates that reduced oral antibiotic administration duration can be sufficient for MRONJ prevention when combined with proper preventive measures [61].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is particularly recommended for patients who are not eligible for surgery or prefer non-surgical interventions. The study compared three antibiotic regimens for preventing MRONJ in patients undergoing tooth extractions while on antiresorptive therapy, finding no significant difference in MRONJ development among groups treated with intravenous antibiotics for 7 days, oral antibiotics for 14 days, or oral antibiotics for 7 days [61]. This indicates that reduced oral antibiotic administration duration can be sufficient for MRONJ prevention when combined with proper preventive measures [61].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study compared three antibiotic regimens for preventing MRONJ in patients undergoing tooth extractions while on antiresorptive therapy, finding no significant difference in MRONJ development among groups treated with intravenous antibiotics for 7 days, oral antibiotics for 14 days, or oral antibiotics for 7 days [61]. This indicates that reduced oral antibiotic administration duration can be sufficient for MRONJ prevention when combined with proper preventive measures [61]. Studies on the systemic administration of ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin for MRONJ demonstrate their effectiveness in reaching therapeutic jawbone concentrations [23,62].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%