2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04856-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Algorithms to Synthesize a Petri Net from a Partial Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of regions considered in this paper is similar to the one developed in [4]. But the idea of considering token flows is replaced by using so called transition regions (compare [3]). Since in general there are infinitely many regions, in [4] a finite set of so called basis regions representing all feasible places is computed.…”
Section: Synthesis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The definition of regions considered in this paper is similar to the one developed in [4]. But the idea of considering token flows is replaced by using so called transition regions (compare [3]). Since in general there are infinitely many regions, in [4] a finite set of so called basis regions representing all feasible places is computed.…”
Section: Synthesis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea is to append events to LPOs given by the language of the term such that the resulting behaviour, called a wrong continuation of the term, is not specified by the term. Then for each wrong continuation a region is computed such that the corresponding feasible place separates the wrong continuation (compare [3]), if such a place exists. In the positive case the place is added to the net and the next wrong continuation is considered, in the negative case it is directly proceeded with the next wrong continuation.…”
Section: Synthesis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations