2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of differences between copper bioaccumulation and biosorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In phases 7 and 8, residual concentration slightly violated the regulatory guideline limit of 0.2 mg/L due to damage on the surfaces of living cells, resulting in the partial loss of sorption abilities and the release of accumulated metal into the solution [16]. Copper can significantly damage the surfaces of living cells which could lead to partial loss of cell binding abilities and release of accumulated copper back into solution [17]. Similar observations was also made by other works [16].…”
Section: Copper Removal By Gwtps Reactorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In phases 7 and 8, residual concentration slightly violated the regulatory guideline limit of 0.2 mg/L due to damage on the surfaces of living cells, resulting in the partial loss of sorption abilities and the release of accumulated metal into the solution [16]. Copper can significantly damage the surfaces of living cells which could lead to partial loss of cell binding abilities and release of accumulated copper back into solution [17]. Similar observations was also made by other works [16].…”
Section: Copper Removal By Gwtps Reactorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These constituents play a diverse role in metal ion binding, i.e., these components create the sites for binding of metal ion. Biosorption process of metal ions is quite fast and independent of cell metabolism (Veglio and Belochini 1997;Kadukova and Vircikova 2005). This process is also known as passive biosorption.…”
Section: Biosorption and Bioaccumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, plants may have possibly been in contact with a higher concentration of copper in its free ionic form during the first minutes to hours of the bioassay. Studies on the kinetics of heavy metals uptake by aquatic plants have revealed an initial phase of fast metal removal followed by a lineal slower phase [23] and, in accordance with this, [4] found that S. minima lead and cadmium uptake was 55 % and 60 %, respectively, during the first 4 to 6 hours of their bioassay. May S. minima's copper removal uptake been higher without metal precipitation?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%