2016
DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2016.28.2.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Difference in Hematologic and Hemodynamic Outcomes between Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty and Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: PurposeThis study is to identify preoperative cautions for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by understanding the differences in hematologic and hemodynamic changes between primary TKA and revision of infected TKA.Materials and MethodsThe study included 40 patients in each of the two groups: one group with patients who underwent TKA and the other group with patients who underwent revision of infected TKA. All patients matched for age and body mass index. The following data were compared betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing differences in specific complications, patients with infected TKAs undergoing revision had higher risks of sepsis, wound infection, shock, and renal failure than patients undergoing revision TKA in the absence of infection. These results could be explained by prior studies that have shown that infected patients undergoing revision TKA have greater hemodynamic variation and blood loss than aseptic patients [28]. Other studies have linked PJI to higher rates of DVT in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty [10], but we found no increase when controlling for other confounding variables.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…When analyzing differences in specific complications, patients with infected TKAs undergoing revision had higher risks of sepsis, wound infection, shock, and renal failure than patients undergoing revision TKA in the absence of infection. These results could be explained by prior studies that have shown that infected patients undergoing revision TKA have greater hemodynamic variation and blood loss than aseptic patients [28]. Other studies have linked PJI to higher rates of DVT in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty [10], but we found no increase when controlling for other confounding variables.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Several studies have examined the increased postoperative bleeding risk in revision total joint arthroplasty when compared with primary total joint arthroplasty. [19][20][21][22] The increased soft tissue and bone resection necessitated in revision joint surgery elevate the risk for postoperative complications and bleeding, making blood conservation strategies and preoperative patient optimiza-tion important. 19,20 Similarly, with rates of rTKA projected to increase 601% from 2005 to 2030 within the United States, patient selection and understanding of perioperative risk are of increasing importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, blood transfusion rates are higher after revision of infected TKA, which often leads to increased postoperative complications 13 15) . Shon et al 4) article in this issue reports that the transfusion rate was higher in the revision TKA group (20%) than in the primary TKA group (12%), and the postoperative blood loss and transfusion volume were also greater in the revision group. The authors emphasize that surgeons should pay more attention to patients’ postoperative general condition to reduce postoperative complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another original article by Juul et al 3) reported on the use of a new knee prosthesis as an articulating spacer in two-stage revision of infected TKA. The other original article by Shon et al 4) compared hemodynamic and hematologic changes between the TKA group and the revision group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%