2006
DOI: 10.1644/05-mamm-a-225r2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Diets Between Two Sympatric Flying Squirrel Species in Northern Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid competition between sympatric squirrel species, both spatial and trophic partitioning are indispensable (Gautier-Hion et al 1980;Brown and Batzli 1985;Saiful et al 2001;Shafique et al 2006). In general, the two species studied here are highly sympatric throughout Southeast Asia (Can et al 2008;Francis 2008;Smith and Xie 2008) and often caught together in same capture sites (Can et al 2008;).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To avoid competition between sympatric squirrel species, both spatial and trophic partitioning are indispensable (Gautier-Hion et al 1980;Brown and Batzli 1985;Saiful et al 2001;Shafique et al 2006). In general, the two species studied here are highly sympatric throughout Southeast Asia (Can et al 2008;Francis 2008;Smith and Xie 2008) and often caught together in same capture sites (Can et al 2008;).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Small‐bodied mammals were notably less active than larger species and were predominantly nocturnal (Table 3, Table S1), potentially supporting hypotheses that small mammals maintain lower activity levels to conserve energy (Hazlerigg & Tyler, 2019), and are more active at night when thermoregulatory pressures are eased (Crompton et al, 1978). Large mammals, on the contrary, may spend more time foraging to meet increased energetic demands (Cid et al, 2020), particularly carnivores, whose prey is often patchily distributed (Azlan & Sharma, 2006), and herbivores, who may consume more in order to compensate for the lower nutritional quality of their diet (Shafique et al, 2006). Indeed, most cathemeral species in our study were large‐bodied carnivores or herbivores (Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In squirrels, both spatial and trophic partitioning are pointed out to be essential to prevent competition between sympatric species (Gautier-Hion et al, 1980;Brown & Batzli, 1985;Abdullah, Yusoff-Rashid & Idris, 2001;Saiful et al, 2001;Shafique et al, 2006). It is worth noting that habitat preference differs remarkably between C. erythraeus and D. rufigenis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacKinnon, 1978;Muul & Lim, 1978;Weigl, 1978;Emmons, 1980;Glanz, 1984;Ando, Shiraishi & Uchida, 1985;Wells-Gosling, 1985;Lee, Progulske & Lin, 1986;Derge & Yahner, 2000;Saiful et al, 2001;Shafique et al, 2006). In mammals, differentiation of dietary resources is often considered particularly essential to avoid competition and enable sympatry between closely related species (Brown & Batzli, 1985;Ungar, 1995;Davies, Oates & Dasilva, 1999;Shah, 2003;Shafique et al, 2006). If dietary differentiation is significant between species, we may expect to see a divergence in the craniodental traits that are responsible for the initial processing of food, which play an important role in dietary specialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%