1995
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)00040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of diastolic filling models and their fit to transmitral Doppler contours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several nonlinear and one linear model of diastolic filling have been proposed (15,21), no previous work addresses the efficiency of filling (diastole) by itself, in either mechanical or thermodynamic terms. Because the kinematic model and other nonlinear models (21) of filling accurately predict E wave contours, the modeling paradigm itself provides a method by which filling efficiency can be characterized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several nonlinear and one linear model of diastolic filling have been proposed (15,21), no previous work addresses the efficiency of filling (diastole) by itself, in either mechanical or thermodynamic terms. Because the kinematic model and other nonlinear models (21) of filling accurately predict E wave contours, the modeling paradigm itself provides a method by which filling efficiency can be characterized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their derivation used Newton's law (only valid in linear dynamic system) to predict that the deceleration portion of all E-waves have the shape of a cosine function. A more accurate kinematic model, previously proposed by Kovács et al (1987;Hall and Kovács, 1994), uses a linear model for suction-initiated filling (a linear harmonic oscillator) that predicts and fits transmitral E-wave contours as well as nonlinear models (Hall and Kovács, 1994;Kovács et al, 1987Kovács et al, , 2000a and has the advantage of being able to solve the "inverse-problem" and thereby determine model parameters uniquely (Hall and Kovács, 1994;Nudelman et al, 1995). In Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). It is important to note that, unlike the PDF model, other more mathematically sophisticated nonlinear and multiparameter models of diastolic physiology do not allow for unique parameter extraction from clinically observed E-waves (85). Just as with the stiffness and relaxation model of IVR above, the stiffness and relaxation model of the E-wave predicts different regimes of filling dynamics, depending on the relative values of model parameters.…”
Section: Early Rapid Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%