2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of diagnostic performance of AFP, DCP and two diagnostic models in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the aforementioned GALAD score and the algorithms, there are several AFP-integrated protein-based panels still under phase 2 biomarker validation (Table 2 ). For example, using the same variables included in the GALAD score, GALAD-C, 86 87 GAAP, 86 87 116 ASAP, 116 117 118 and AALP 87 models were tailored and validated for HCC detection in Chinese populations. Another approach includes the incorporation of machine-learning models, such as gradient boosting that optimize the combination of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP to augment HCC detection.…”
Section: Afp As a Detection/screening Biomarker For Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned GALAD score and the algorithms, there are several AFP-integrated protein-based panels still under phase 2 biomarker validation (Table 2 ). For example, using the same variables included in the GALAD score, GALAD-C, 86 87 GAAP, 86 87 116 ASAP, 116 117 118 and AALP 87 models were tailored and validated for HCC detection in Chinese populations. Another approach includes the incorporation of machine-learning models, such as gradient boosting that optimize the combination of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP to augment HCC detection.…”
Section: Afp As a Detection/screening Biomarker For Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%