Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Okonogi, Taichi; Kawasaki, Terukazu; Koga, Hisashi; Orita, Yoshiya; Umeji, Kyoko; Fukuoka, Ryota; Hirai, Keisuke; Haraguchi, Kazuki; Kajiyama, Kimihiro; Fukami, Yurie; Soejima, Toshiya; Yamabe, Hiroshige; Koga, Nobuhiko

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.012

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…FFR-CT has higher accuracy of diagnostic performance for detecting ischemia-causing stenosis than CCTA and a good correlation with invasive FFR values [4] . Moreover, in patients with MVD, FFR-CT has a higher sensitivity (FFR-CT: 93 % vs. MPS: 51 %) and a lower false negative value (FFR-CT: 7 % vs. MPS: 49 %) than MPS for detecting myocardial ischemia [10] . In this context, FFR-CT may be more useful for MVD or LMCA lesions than MPS to identify ischemia-causing stenosis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%