2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DFT functionals for prediction of band gap of conjugated polymers and effect of HF exchange term percentage and basis set on the performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HLG energy is directly related to conductivity and reactivity of the bulk nanomaterials, and can be regarded as a significant parameter in the analysis of the adsorption process. It was found from previous works that, although PBEPBE functional is an appropriate method in the optimization of bulk systems under PBC method, however, underestimates HLG energies, whereas, HLG values obtained from B3LYP method are in more agreement with experimental data . HLG energies of isolated BN/BN(Al)/BN(Ga) have been calculated to be: 4.52/3.14/2.51 eV (PBEPBE), 6.28/4.62/3.94 eV (B3LYP), 7.99/6.65/5.96 eV (CAM−B3LYP) and 8.05/6.42/5.90 eV (M062X), respectively, and therefore, HLG trend of DFT functionals are: M062X > CAM−B3LYP > B3LYP > PBEPBE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…HLG energy is directly related to conductivity and reactivity of the bulk nanomaterials, and can be regarded as a significant parameter in the analysis of the adsorption process. It was found from previous works that, although PBEPBE functional is an appropriate method in the optimization of bulk systems under PBC method, however, underestimates HLG energies, whereas, HLG values obtained from B3LYP method are in more agreement with experimental data . HLG energies of isolated BN/BN(Al)/BN(Ga) have been calculated to be: 4.52/3.14/2.51 eV (PBEPBE), 6.28/4.62/3.94 eV (B3LYP), 7.99/6.65/5.96 eV (CAM−B3LYP) and 8.05/6.42/5.90 eV (M062X), respectively, and therefore, HLG trend of DFT functionals are: M062X > CAM−B3LYP > B3LYP > PBEPBE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The functional M06‐L used is assembled by using (c), (d), (e) whereas M06‐HF used is full HF exchange functional which is assembled by (c), (d), (e) and (f) . Therefore, the overall meta exchange‐correlation functional used are M06 L, M06, M06‐2X and M06‐HF . The range separator hybrid functionals, such as CAM−B3LYP, the long‐range corrected (LC) functionals ωB97, with ωB97X, and ωB97XD are used for the improvement of the results, which hold one extra parameter with the short‐range exchange.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quantitative estimation of NLO properties (ie, polarizability and hyperpolarizability parameters) is still a challenging job because of the fact that the performance of functionals needs to invariably benchmarked for a particular systems . To solve such genuine issues, it is mandatory to use the combination of functionals, which have the different Hartree‐Fock (HF) exchange percentage (%) to find out the proper functional to calculate NLO properties of desired molecule . As the percentage of HF exchange differs in the global hybrid (GH) functionals, which have impact on the validity of that particular functional to estimate the NLO properties .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the percentage of HF exchange differs in the global hybrid (GH) functionals, which have impact on the validity of that particular functional to estimate the NLO properties . The “GH” functionals, which have a constant “HF” exchange percentage, became very useful as they perform well in electronic structure calculations . Inspite of vast popularity of GH functionals in the field of quantum chemistry calculations, there are drawbacks due to its exact HF exchange amount, which limits their use to calculate the hyperpolarizability parameters for a range of molecules .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%