2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of depth-specific groundwater sampling methods and their influence on hydrochemistry, isotopy and dissolved gases – Experiences from the Fuhrberger Feld, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection and quantification was performed with a Thermo Scientific ISQ Single quadrupole mass spectrometer. Tap water, equilibrated with ambient air at known temperature and pressure, was used for calibration (more details see Houben et al., 2018).…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection and quantification was performed with a Thermo Scientific ISQ Single quadrupole mass spectrometer. Tap water, equilibrated with ambient air at known temperature and pressure, was used for calibration (more details see Houben et al., 2018).…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for the bias induced by ambient flow, depth-dependent sampling [ 35 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] or vertical monitoring well nests [ 28 , 34 , 50 , 51 ] have been employed in many studies. However, these methods are technically challenging and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%