2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dental implant systems: Quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal studies reporting on adverse clinical outcomes are necessary to provide practitioners with evidence-based treatment planning and patients with informed consent. 170 Level 2A to 5 evidence supports the discussion on maintenance of the MC restoration.…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 54%
“…Longitudinal studies reporting on adverse clinical outcomes are necessary to provide practitioners with evidence-based treatment planning and patients with informed consent. 170 Level 2A to 5 evidence supports the discussion on maintenance of the MC restoration.…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 54%
“…20,21,22 Various implant systems have a better clinical performance in terms of maintaining the bone crest. 23 From a technological development perspective, expectations are that implants be capable of maintaining the bone structure around the implant platform. Therefore, it is not until implants safely behaving as tooth roots are available, that is, implants capable of maintaining the bone crest unchanged around the crown, that clinicians should consider using a single implant to replace two lost neighboring teeth, since this procedure is likely to result in better performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental implants can effectively replace missing teeth, although a healing period is required to allow osseointegration of the implants 6) . This healing period for osseointegration has been shortened through the use of technologies of surface modification of fixtures [7][8][9] , as well as modified clinical procedures such as immediate-loading 10) or early loading 11) protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%