2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DEM predictions and measured wall-media contact forces and work in a vibratory finisher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the randomness in individual collisions of particles contributes to some of the small residuals between simulations and observations (Maciel and Spelt, 2019). However for the simulation of assemblies of particles, the macroscopic characteristic of group motion of particles can be well reflected by the DEM, as the individual random errors are equally distributed into assemblies of particles during the simulation.…”
Section: Structure Optimization Of Plough Bladesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the randomness in individual collisions of particles contributes to some of the small residuals between simulations and observations (Maciel and Spelt, 2019). However for the simulation of assemblies of particles, the macroscopic characteristic of group motion of particles can be well reflected by the DEM, as the individual random errors are equally distributed into assemblies of particles during the simulation.…”
Section: Structure Optimization Of Plough Bladesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the scatter plots of the observed wear volumes vs the energies for abrasive damage in wear region 3 is much less than those in wear regions 1 and 2 as shown in Figures 13 and 18. Since the measurement of the energy for abrasive damage involves not only the relative velocity but also the collision angle just before the collision as in Equation (6), the randomness in individual collisions of the structural boundary with particles in the DEM simulation 51 can contribute to some of the small deviations between the measured and the actual energy for abrasive damage. Provided that the individual random errors can be equally distributed into the sample data in linear regression, the less number of the scatter plots in wear region 3 can result in a larger effect of the randomness in individual collisions on the measurement precision of the energy in wear region 3, and also can bring a less obvious linear relationship between the observed wear volumes and the energies for abrasive damage in wear region 3, compared with wear regions 1 and 2.…”
Section: Case With Different Diameters D I Of Spherical Boundary Elemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the understanding and measurement of the trajectories of the abrasive media and workpiece is very important to the vibratory finishing process, and significant progress has been made both in mathematical simulations [7,8] and experimental studies [9][10][11][12]. In addition, the discrete element (DME) method has been employed in studies [13][14][15][16] for the mass finishing process. Hashemnia et al [17] studied the fluidized granular media at top, middle and bottom of the finisher using DEM simulation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%