2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41405-020-00051-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of decayed, missing, filled teeth index between thalassemia major patients and control group in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction Scientific evidence of the association between Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) and thalassemia are conflicting and difficult to establish conclusions. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the relationship between dental caries (using the DMFT index) and thalassemia major using meta-analysis. Methods Databases were searched using such keywords as “Thalassemia,” “Caries,” “decay,” “DMFT,” “Iran,” and OR operators, AND, and NOT. After the elimination of duplicate documentation, the art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BDJ Portfolio has a number of publications which publish systematic reviews and the advantages of open access publishing remain attractive to authors of such articles. Two were published in BDJ Open between 2019 and 2020 -one comparing the DMFT index between thalassemia major patients and a control group, 44 and one investigating aerosol, splatter and droplet contamination associated with oral surgery in the context of COVID-19. 45…”
Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BDJ Portfolio has a number of publications which publish systematic reviews and the advantages of open access publishing remain attractive to authors of such articles. Two were published in BDJ Open between 2019 and 2020 -one comparing the DMFT index between thalassemia major patients and a control group, 44 and one investigating aerosol, splatter and droplet contamination associated with oral surgery in the context of COVID-19. 45…”
Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%