2016 International Workshop on Computational Intelligence (IWCI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iwci.2016.7860359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cyclostationary and energy detection in cognitive radio network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…67 However, because it is easy to implement recent research works on detecting PU signals have implemented energy detection overmatched filter detection. 78 Still, because energy detection relies only on noise power for PU signal detection its performance is seriously affected by uncertainty in noise power. 79 To counter this challenge, a fixed threshold value called SNR wall is normally used to indicate an uncertainty level.…”
Section: Energy Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 However, because it is easy to implement recent research works on detecting PU signals have implemented energy detection overmatched filter detection. 78 Still, because energy detection relies only on noise power for PU signal detection its performance is seriously affected by uncertainty in noise power. 79 To counter this challenge, a fixed threshold value called SNR wall is normally used to indicate an uncertainty level.…”
Section: Energy Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable dynamic spectrum access, these systems perform spectrum sensing to decide on the presence or absence of the primary user [2,3]. Several sensing techniques have been proposed to sense the radio spectrum including energy detection [4][5][6][7][8], autocorrelation [9][10][11][12], and matched filter based sensing [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this energy is higher than this threshold, then the primary user is deemed to be present; otherwise, the primary user signal is considered absent. This technique is simple as it does not require any prior information about the primary user signal, which makes it much more straightforward than matched filter and autocorrelation sensing technique [5]. However, the performance of this technique is highly dependent on the noise which is random [6]; thus, using a static threshold degrades the performance of energy detection [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the spectrum sensing, the secondary users identify the state of each frequency channel-free or occupied-using spectrum sensing techniques, such as energy detection [4][5][6][7][8][9], cyclostationary features detection [10][11][12][13][14][15], and matched filter detection [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%