2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000164028.14504.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of CT, MRI, and Radiographs in Assessing Pelvic Osteolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
121
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3). The volumes of synovitis and osteolysis were calculated using a previously validated method of manual segmentation from the coronal MAVRIC or axial FSE images [26,32]. The pseudocapsule was evaluated for dehiscence, which was characterized by either anterior or posterior capsular detachment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The volumes of synovitis and osteolysis were calculated using a previously validated method of manual segmentation from the coronal MAVRIC or axial FSE images [26,32]. The pseudocapsule was evaluated for dehiscence, which was characterized by either anterior or posterior capsular detachment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for the assessment of periprosthetic osteolysis and wear-induced synovitis (4)(5)(6). MRI also allows assessment of regional tendons and neurovascular structures, which are a potential cause of pain in a patient with a painful arthroplasty who is being considered for revision surgery.…”
Section: Instructions On Receiving Creditmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT also has the disadvantage of exposing the patient to ionizing radiation and the techniques required to minimize beam-hardening artifact in the presence of metallic implants even further increase the effective dose to the patient, which can prove a burden in the setting of serial examinations. MRI is superior to conventional radiographs and CT in the assessment of periprosthetic osteolysis and has been shown to be the most sensitive method to quantify the extent of periprosthetic osteolysis (5,6). In a cadaveric model of simulated osteolysis surrounding hip implants, MRI demonstrates a sensitivity of 95%, compared to CT (with high kVp) of 75% and radiographs (including oblique views) of 52%, with similar specificities, thus indicating MRI was the most accurate means by which to detect and quantify periprosthetic bone loss (5).…”
Section: Periprosthetic Osteolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there have been numerous studies examining its role in imaging THA [3,7,38,39,46,[50][51][52]. MRI is effective for detecting periarticular bony and soft-tissue abnormalities in patients with a postarthroplasty hip [3,39,46,52], as well as determining the source of enigmatic hip following THA [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%