2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cryopreserved human sperm from solid surface vitrification and standard vapor freezing method: on motility, morphology, vitality and DNA integrity

Abstract: Solid surface vitrificaition (SSV) is a cryoperservative method that has been used in the cryopreservation of oocytes, and embryos. Here, we report an application of the SSV in the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. We compared the SSV with a standard freezing method in terms of sperm motility, morphology, vitality and DNA integrity. Sperm motility was determined by computer assisted semen analysis, morphology and vitality were determined by eosin-methylene blue staining, and DNA integrity was determined b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the best results reported in the literature stem from experiments with human sperm (Satirapod et al. ), inclusive studies when no CPAs were added (Saki et al. ), while some attempts have recently been carried out in animals (Sánchez et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the best results reported in the literature stem from experiments with human sperm (Satirapod et al. ), inclusive studies when no CPAs were added (Saki et al. ), while some attempts have recently been carried out in animals (Sánchez et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a view to improving human sperm recovery and avoiding cryodamage, various methods of sperm cryopreservation have been developed and compared in terms of sperm viability and motility (for a review, see Royere et al, 1996; Oehninger et al, 2000; Di Santo et al, 2012). In 2011, no fewer than 7 publications presented and compared new cryopreservation methods (Creemers et al, 2011; Isachenko et al, 2011; Martinez‐Soto et al, 2011; Menegazzo et al, 2011; Peng et al, 2011; Rahana et al, 2011; Satirapod et al, 2012). Recently, a model of sperm cryodamage was developed (John Morris et al, 2012) in order to try to understand the effects of slow and rapid freezing or vitrification on spermatozoa cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of that, it is important to understand the effects of cryopreservation to preserve the better quality of the thawed sample. It has been shown that cryopreservation reduces sperm motility and sperm vitality (Thomson et al ., ; Lee et al ., ; Satirapod et al ., ). Recent studies have been focused on the effect of cryopreservation on sperm DNA damage, showing that the main effector of DNA damage during the process of freezing and thawing a semen sample are the reactive oxygen species (Lasso et al ., ; Thomson et al ., ; Said et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%