Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America

Abstract

BackgroundInfluenza causes an estimated 3000 to 50,000 deaths per year in the United States of America (US). Timely and representative data can help local, state, and national public health officials monitor and respond to outbreaks of seasonal influenza. Data from cloud-based electronic health records (EHR) and crowd-sourced influenza surveillance systems have the potential to provide complementary, near real-time estimates of influenza activity. The objectives of this paper are to compare two novel influenza-tracking systems with three traditional healthcare-based influenza surveillance systems at four spatial resolutions: national, regional, state, and city, and to determine the minimum number of participants in these systems required to produce influenza activity estimates that resemble the historical trends recorded by traditional surveillance systems.MethodsWe compared influenza activity estimates from five influenza surveillance systems: 1) patient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) from the US Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network (ILINet), 2) virologic data from World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) Laboratories, 3) Emergency Department (ED) syndromic surveillance from Boston, Massachusetts, 4) patient visits for ILI from EHR, and 5) reports of ILI from the crowd-sourced system, Flu Near You (FNY), by calculating correlations between these systems across four influenza seasons, 2012–16, at four different spatial resolutions in the US. For the crowd-sourced system, we also used a bootstrapping statistical approach to estimate the minimum number of reports necessary to produce a meaningful signal at a given spatial resolution.ResultsIn general, as the spatial resolution increased, correlation values between all influenza surveillance systems decreased. Influenza-like Illness rates in geographic areas with more than 250 crowd-sourced participants or with more than 20,000 visit counts for EHR tracked government-lead estimates of influenza activity.ConclusionsWith a sufficient number of reports, data from novel influenza surveillance systems can complement traditional healthcare-based systems at multiple spatial resolutions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Epidemiological features and trends of influenza incidence in mainland China: A population-based surveillance study from 2005 to 2015

“…The children with age of >14 were examined in the 2016/2017 epidemic season, and the results demonstrated that children due to immature immunity are at particular risk for influenza (Cieslak et al, 2018). In the United States, Baltrusaitis et al found that data from novel influenza surveillance systems can complement with traditional healthcare-based systems at multiple spatial resolutions (Baltrusaitis et al, 2018).…”

Influenza‐like illness in Australia: A comparison of general practice surveillance system with electronic medical records

“…10 Studies in the Unites States and Portugal also found good agreement between sentinel GP surveillance data and alternative databases using EMR, with correlations ranging between 0.78 and 0.99. 11,12 In ASPREN, a rise in ILI cases started earlier each year compared with MedicineInsight which is probably related to the increase in other acute respiratory infections, particularly URTI, as identified in MedicineInsight. Because GPs can label the same set of respiratory symptoms differently, 9 it is plausible that ASPREN GPs might code other respiratory infections as ILI because of their role in the sentinel system (ie observer bias).…”

COVID-19 Self-Reported Symptom Tracking Programs in the United States: Framework Synthesis

“…To overcome the limitations of epidemiological surveillance, internet-based technologies have been developed to estimate and monitor real-time changes in population, soliciting participation from the public at large [ 12 , 13 ]. One approach that has been introduced is self-reported symptom tracking.…”