Comparison of Cropping Systems Including Corn, Peanut, and Tobacco in the North Carolina Coastal Plain

Jordan, David L.; Fisher, Loren R.; Shew, B. B.; Marshall, Ty; Johnson, Peter; Ye, W.; Brandenburg, Rick

doi:10.1094/cm-2009-0612-01-rs

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Peanut response to rotation sequence and diversity has been evaluated in North Carolina with crops including clary sage ( Salvia sclarea L.), corn, cotton, grain sorghum [ Sorgum bicolor (L.) Moench], kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.), snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.), soybean, sweet potato [ Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ], and tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) (Jordan et al, 2002, 2005, 2009a, 2009b, 2009c, 2014). As expected, increasing the number of years between peanut planting often increased peanut yield (Johnson et al, 2001; Jordan et al, 2002; Lamb et al, 1993).…”

Section: Useful Conversionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Previous Rotation on Plant Parasitic Nematode Population in Peanut and Crop Yield

Jordan

Corbett

Bogle³

et al. 2017

Crop Forage & Turfgrass Mgmt

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core Ideas A diverse crop rotation reduces soil parasitic nematode population. Impact of previous rotation can persist for multiple years. Wheat yield was greater after continuous peanut than yield of rotations including corn and cotton. Crop rotation is an important part of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production systems to maintain yield through avoidance of plant parasitic nematodes and diseases. Research was conducted at two locations in North Carolina to determine changes in plant parasitic nematode populations and peanut yield in 2013 following a rotation sequence that included two cycles of corn (Zea mays L.) followed by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (2007–2010), corn (2011), and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (2012). Prior to rotations from 2007 to 2013, both short and long rotations of corn, cotton, peanut, and soybean were planted in these plots from 2001 to 2005. Decreases in populations of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) and stunt nematode (Tylenchorhynchus spp.) from 2006 to 2013 were the greatest when peanut was grown continuously from 2001 to 2006. Yields of corn, cotton, soybean, and wheat (2007–2012) were not affected by rotation from 2001 to 2006 at one location. However, at a second location wheat yield during 2008 and 2010 was greater following continuous peanut from 2001 to 2006 than yield following other rotations. Corn yield in one year following continuous peanut was greater than yield following several other rotations with fewer years of peanut or soybean. While peanut yield in 2006 was affected by rotation sequence in previous years (2001–2005), after 6 years of rotation from 2007 to 2012 peanut in 2013 did not differ in yield regardless of rotation from 2001 to 2006. These data indicate that developing adequate diversity of rotation can decrease plant parasitic nematode populations to levels that allow high peanut yield regardless of rotation history.

show abstract

Section: Useful Conversionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Previous Rotation on Plant Parasitic Nematode Population in Peanut and Crop Yield

Jordan

Corbett

Bogle³

et al. 2017

Crop Forage & Turfgrass Mgmt

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Corn following corn also had yield differences between years which could be a year/climatic affect and not necessarily a rotational effect. In other research, corn yields were lower when corn was planted continuously compared with other rotations tested in the North Carolina Coastal Plain (16).…”

Section: Crop Rotation and Corn Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corn Yield Response to Deep Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the Southeast

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Long term grain corn (Zea mays L.) yield with various crop rotations irrigated with subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI) is not known for southeast United States. A subsurface drip irrigation system was installed on Tifton loamy sand with three crop rotations, two drip tube lateral spacings, and three irrigation levels. Crop rotations were alternate year, back‐to‐back, and three years between corn crops. Drip tube laterals were installed underneath each crop row (narrow) and alternate row middles (wide). Crops were irrigated daily at 100, 75, and 50% of estimated crop water use. Irrigation level affected corn yield 6 out of 8 years with 50% irrigation level having lower yield compared with 75 or 100% irrigation level. The 50% irrigation level averaged 7327 kg/ha while the 75 and 100% irrigation levels averaged 9334 and 9691 kg/ha, respectively. The narrow lateral spacing increased corn grain yield 50% of the time but the higher yield may not offset the cost of the increased tubing compared with the wider lateral spacing. There is no clear evidence indicating one specific crop rotation better than another. Applying irrigation at 75% of recommended water use did not reduce crop yield, implying a possible 25% water savings compared with full irrigation.

show abstract

“…While the impact on peanut yield and pest reaction of major agronomic crops such as corn, cotton, grain sorghum [ Sorgum bicolor (L.) Moench. ], soybean, and tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.), as well as specialty crops such as kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.), has been documented in North Carolina (Jordan et al, 2002, 2005, 2009a, 2009b, 2009c), the impact of clary sage, snap bean, and sweet potato on peanut has not been documented. Therefore, research was conducted in North Carolina to determine peanut yield, disease reaction, and populations of plant parasitic nematodes following various rotations including clary sage, snap bean, sweet potato, and traditional rotation crops planted during the 3 years before planting peanut.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Peanut Response to Crop Rotations Including Clary Sage, Snap Bean, and Sweet Potato

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) rotation systems most often include corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). However, more diverse rotation systems can be found in some regions of North Carolina, and rotations of peanut with clary sage (Salvia sclarea L.), snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] have increased in recent years. Research was conducted to determine visible estimates of disease expressed in the peanut canopy, plant parasitic nematode population in soil, and yield of peanut after rotations including clary sage, corn, cotton, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The percentage of the peanut canopy reflecting symptoms associated with a combination of Cylindrocladium black rot and tomato spotted wilt was not affected by rotation but was 8% higher for the peanut cultivar Phillips compared with the cultivar Bailey. Peanut yield was affected by rotation and cultivar but not the interaction of these treatment factors. Peanut yield following a rotation of cotton–corn–sweet potato exceeded that of cotton–corn–cotton. In contrast, yield following the rotation of snap bean‐wheat‐clary sage was lower than yield following cotton‐corn‐cotton. Rotation affected density of lesion and ring nematodes but density did not relate to differences in peanut yield. Results from this experiment indicate that peanut can be grown immediately following sweet potato but not following the rotation of snap bean, wheat, and clary sage without a reduction in peanut yield.

show abstract

Comparison of Cropping Systems Including Corn, Peanut, and Tobacco in the North Carolina Coastal Plain

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Effect of Previous Rotation on Plant Parasitic Nematode Population in Peanut and Crop Yield

Effect of Previous Rotation on Plant Parasitic Nematode Population in Peanut and Crop Yield

Corn Yield Response to Deep Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the Southeast

Peanut Response to Crop Rotations Including Clary Sage, Snap Bean, and Sweet Potato

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About