2010
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200900129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of critical limits for crop plant growth based on different indicators for the state of soil compaction

Abstract: Soil compaction affects physical soil condition, in particular aeration, soil strength, and water availability and has adverse effects on plant growth. Bulk density is the most frequently used indicator to describe the state of compaction of a soil. However, this parameter lacks a direct functional relationship with plant growth. Various indicators have been proposed to simultaneously characterize the state of compaction of agricultural soil and its suitability for plant growth. This paper examines and compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum BD was inherent to the soil and independent of the established compaction treatments ( P ≤ 0.29). Maximum BD values for the studied soils ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 Mg m −3 and agree with the range reported as growth limiting BD for root growth in silty clay loam soils (Kaufmann et al, 2010). The evaluation of PR (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Maximum BD was inherent to the soil and independent of the established compaction treatments ( P ≤ 0.29). Maximum BD values for the studied soils ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 Mg m −3 and agree with the range reported as growth limiting BD for root growth in silty clay loam soils (Kaufmann et al, 2010). The evaluation of PR (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Recorded PR and BD increased with D, consistent with the mulching effect of residue accumulation or tillage incorporation of residue in the surface. The PR values reported here are considered optimal for crop production, below the PR threshold range of 2000 to 4000 kPa suggested as restrictive for root growth (Hamblin, 1985), and we also found BD values lower than BD considered to restrict roots in silt loam soils (Kaufmann et al, 2010). Similar WAS values, a measure of the soil susceptibility to erosion, were recorded for the top 30 cm of the soil, with values increasing in the deeper soil layer (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This may also be because of the higher ρ b found in the conservation system where soil resistance reaches 2.0 MPa at higher moisture contents. These results are in accordance with that of Kaufmann et al (2010) and Olibone et al (2010). In the 0-15 cm soil layer, zero tillage with residue (ZT+R), permanent broad bed with residue (PBB + R), and permanent narrow-beds with residue (PNB + R) had nearly 13, 24, and 11% higher mean LLWR values than ZT, PBB, and PNB plots, respectively; the crop residue retention improved LLWR (Mishra et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%