1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980713)396:4<521::aid-cne8>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cortically and subcortically controlled motor systems: I. Morphology of intracellularly filled rubrospinal neurons in rat and turtle

Abstract: The rat and turtle differ markedly in major structural features of the corticocerebellorubrospinal circuitry. Although both species have a well-developed cerebellorubrospinal system, they differ in that a direct cerebral cortical input to the red nucleus is present only in the rat. The aim of the present study was to compare features of the soma and dendritic morphology of rubrospinal neurons that receive cortical input, as in rats, with those that do not, as in turtles. Intracellular Lucifer Yellow injections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified only ≈10% of the axons of projection neurons. This was consistent with earlier findings in Golgi studies in the macaque (King et al, 1971) and recent observations of rubrospinal cells labeled intracellularly with LY/biocytin in the rat (Lustig et al, 1998). With many neurons, the likely reason was that the axon was lopped near the soma, and its “stump” was not differentiated from a truncated primary dendrite segment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We identified only ≈10% of the axons of projection neurons. This was consistent with earlier findings in Golgi studies in the macaque (King et al, 1971) and recent observations of rubrospinal cells labeled intracellularly with LY/biocytin in the rat (Lustig et al, 1998). With many neurons, the likely reason was that the axon was lopped near the soma, and its “stump” was not differentiated from a truncated primary dendrite segment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We identified only Ϸ10% of the axons of projection neurons. This was consistent with earlier findings in Golgi studies in the macaque (King et al, 1971) and recent observations of rubrospinal cells labeled intracellularly with LY/biocytin in the rat (Lustig et al, 1998). With many neurons, the likely reason was that the axon was lopped near the soma, and its "stump" was not differentiated from a truncated primary dendrite segment.…”
Section: Assessing Whether a Neuron Injected With Ly/biocytin Is Wellsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The dendritic complexity was analyzed by a Scholl analysis (Lustig et al, 1998). Low-magnification pictures were taken of an NB-filled PN, and a set of concentric circles, each 50 m apart, was superimposed on the PN with the cell body in the center of the circles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%