2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of convolutional neural network training strategies for cone-beam CT image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2.5D CNN has been developed to solve the memory consumption problem of 3D models ( Zhang et al, 2021 ). 2.5D CNN has at least three approaches ( Zhang et al, 2021 ; Minnema et al, 2021 ). The first is a combination of outputs of 2D CNNs in three orthogonal planes (axial, coronal, and sagittal) with majority voting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5D CNN has been developed to solve the memory consumption problem of 3D models ( Zhang et al, 2021 ). 2.5D CNN has at least three approaches ( Zhang et al, 2021 ; Minnema et al, 2021 ). The first is a combination of outputs of 2D CNNs in three orthogonal planes (axial, coronal, and sagittal) with majority voting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker et al [23] applied a hybrid NN model, CNN+LSTM, for estimating blood pressure from raw electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram waveforms and demonstrated that ML techniques are an effective approach for blood pressure estimation and are ready for implementing them into wearable devices. Minnema et al [24] evaluated different CNN training strategies for CT image segmentation. The results indicate that analyzing the structure of the images helps performance improvement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review [9,24] inspired our study of personalized health care prediction by analyzing the groups of patients for comprehensive care needs. The literature review [27] has demonstrated that multi-classifiers could yield high detection performance.…”
Section: Lstm-based Personalized Care Prediction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several U-Nets including 2D U-Net 20,21 , 2.5D U-Net 22 , and 3D U-Net 23 have been proposed for CBCT segmentation. A variant of 2.5D U-Net using majority voting of 2D U-Nets trained by 3 orthogonal imaging planes has been shown to outperform any single U-Net for maxillary and mandibular bony structure segmentation on CBCT 24 . To the best of our knowledge, CT using a 3.5D U-Net integrating 2D U-Nets, 2.5D U-Net, and 3D U-Net has never been documented yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we applied majority voting to create 4 additional U-Nets. Via combining the predictions of 2D U-Nets trained from each of three orthogonal slices 24 using majority voting, a 2.5Dv U-Net was generated. Three additional 3.5D U-Nets Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%