1978
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(78)90234-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of convolution and pulse methods for line narrowing in protein NMR spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since homonuclear decoupling was used to suppress the residual HDO line in this spectrum, the intensities are likely to be effected by cross-relaxation phenomena and thus unfortunately cannot be used for direct estimation of the amino acid composition. Multiplication of the free induction decays with a sinebell results in line narrowing for sharp resonances and removes broad resonances from the spectrum (Gassner et al, 1978). When this technique was applied to phosvitin, all resonances sharpened in the NMR spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since homonuclear decoupling was used to suppress the residual HDO line in this spectrum, the intensities are likely to be effected by cross-relaxation phenomena and thus unfortunately cannot be used for direct estimation of the amino acid composition. Multiplication of the free induction decays with a sinebell results in line narrowing for sharp resonances and removes broad resonances from the spectrum (Gassner et al, 1978). When this technique was applied to phosvitin, all resonances sharpened in the NMR spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for Opa60, spectra from both spectrometers were sampled in the proton dimension to 9.1 ms for linewidth determination, and for nitrogen linewidth analysis, 12.5 ms nitrogen sampling was used at 1200 MHz and 15.75 ms for the 950 MHz spectra, ensuring a valid comparison in ppm, and >3 times T 2 for the narrowest signal identified. The 2D spectra were apodized with a cosine squared function (VDAC) or an 18 degree shifted cosine squared function (M2, Opa60, CitA) using the Qsine [ 63 , 64 ] function: sin [(π − π/SSB)t + π/SSB)] with SSB of 2 or 2.5 in order to minimally change the line shapes in 2D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation is a filtering function that weights later times in the FID [digital points containing information on resonances of narrower linewidths (longer TJ more heavily than earlier ones that contain more information about intrinsically broad components (short TJ]. This operation will result in distortion of relative intensities depending on differences in linewidths and degree of overlap with other resonances (Gassner et al, 1978). Unless large changes occur in individual resonance linewidths or in the degree of resonance overlap during an experiment, relative changes of a given resonance amplitude should not be significantly affected by this form of data processing.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Nmr Parameters For In Vivo Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%