The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional drilling and orbital drilling in machining carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of coolant and lubricant also affects the quality of the hole produced. The coolant and tool geometry (Bharti and Moulick, 2013; Voss et al., 2016) have directly influenced on cutting temperature and the tool wear. Effective parameters of the drilling process are tool diameter, cutting speed, feed rate, coolant of drilling process, material type, and cutting tool features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of coolant and lubricant also affects the quality of the hole produced. The coolant and tool geometry (Bharti and Moulick, 2013; Voss et al., 2016) have directly influenced on cutting temperature and the tool wear. Effective parameters of the drilling process are tool diameter, cutting speed, feed rate, coolant of drilling process, material type, and cutting tool features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool paths of helical milling (also known as orbital drilling) are more complex than tool paths of conventional drilling: operation time of helical milling is therefore longer and more time is needed for optimisation [86]. As can be seen on Fig.…”
Section: Conventional Drilling and Helical Milling Of Cfrpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional drilling and helical milling strategies in CFRPs were compared by Voss et al [86]. They found that orbital drilling produces fewer geometrical defects (delamination and uncut fibres) in CFRPs than conventional drilling, which Geier and Szalay [7] also observed.…”
Section: Conventional Drilling and Helical Milling Of Cfrpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between conventional and orbital drilling of heavy-to-cut unidirectional CFRP parts with diamond coated tools was presented in [ 54 ], focusing on workpiece damages, tool wear, bore diameter variances, as well as cycle times. Orbital drilling generated a better hole quality with lower process forces, but required a more complex/dynamic machine tool and longer process times.…”
Section: Conventional Machining Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%