Comparison of conventional ceramic laminate veneers, partial laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations in fracture strength after aging

Gresnigt, Marco; Sugii, Mari Miura; Johanns, Karin B F W; Made, Stephan A M van der

doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104172

Cited by 25 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the observed fractures, half corresponded to minor cracks and were not considered failures. As previously shown in an in vitro study of this type of restoration, cracks do not necessarily have a negative effect on fracture strength [32]. They may occur during tooth preparation, the adhesive luting procedure, or during function, where environmental factors, such as thermal changes and fatigue, may play…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

“…This multicenter retrospective clinical trial investigated the survival and success rates of PLVs performed in three different dental clinics with four operators. To date, only a few in vitro studies and clinical reports on this noninvasive approach have been published [2,[25][26][27][28]32,33]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical study conducted on ceramic PLVs with up to 8 years of follow-up.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, retention relies completely on adhesion, which is primarily achieved by bonding to the conditioned glassy surface [29][30][31]. Despite their growing popularity, available data in the literature on PLVs are limited to a few in vitro studies [32,33] and case reports [2,[25][26][27][28], without any clinical information available at present. In this context, the objective of this multicenter retrospective clinical trial was to study the long-term clinical performance of ceramic PLVs with up to 8 years of clinical service.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

Durán

Oosterhaven

et al. 2023

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continuous improvement in adhesive technologies has allowed the development of diverse, minimally invasive treatment alternatives. In the anterior region, several causes can lead to the need for restoration, including decay; structurally compromised teeth due to fractures and trauma; morphological corrections (e.g., diastema and conoid teeth), or misaligned teeth [1,2]. Restorative approaches in the anterior region range from minimal intervention using direct resin composites to more invasive procedures using indirect laminate veneers or full crowns [3][4][5][6].Current trends in dentistry seek the maximum preservation of sound tooth structures [7]. Full crowns depart from these conservative principles, since they require the removal of a considerable amount of healthy tissue, including most of the remnant enamel, from the tooth preparation surface in dentin [8]. Accordingly, 63% to 72% by weight of coronal structure can be lost when preparing an anterior tooth for a crown. This increases the risk of pulp exposure, thus compromising vitality and biomechanical integrity [9].Ceramic laminate veneers are a minimally invasive treatment that has been extensively used in the anterior region because of its esthetic advantages and long-term success [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Conventional ceramic veneers require a minimum reduction of 0.3 to 0.5 mm, to achieve sufficient thickness for ceramic restoration [16,17]. However, a larger enamel reduction may be needed depending on esthetic requirements. For instance, a 0.8 to 1.2 mm preparation is needed in darkened teeth to obtain the correct color integration of the ceramic restoration [18,19].

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

Durán

Oosterhaven

et al. 2023

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As facetas de cerâmica não são afetadas por esses fatores, mas são uma opção mais invasiva. Ambos os tipos de restaurações estão sujeitos a fraturas (Gresnigt, Sugii, Johanns, & Made, 2021). Gouveia et al (2018), no estudo reiteram que ao restaurar os dentes anteriores, é necessário a escolha dos materiais corretos, como: tipos de resinas, sistemas adesivos e ótimos fotopolimerizadores, pois os mesmos são essenciais para a qualidade da técnica.…”

Section: Fonte: Autores (2021)unclassified

Facetas diretas anteriores: Uma revisão de literatura

Campos

Rodrigues

Figueiredo

et al. 2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A procura por uma estética dental agradável e harmoniosa tem proporcionado um aumento significante nas pesquisas de novos materiais e técnicas de restauração direta que otimizem a qualidade, atingindo padrões quase que imperceptíveis da interface dente-restauração, além de devolver a forma e função do elemento, com menor desgaste da estrutura dental, quando comparado aos meios indiretos. Nesse sentido, o objetivo desse estudo foi realizar uma revisão bibliográfica da literatura sobre facetas diretas anteriores expondo suas vantagens e limitações em comparação com as facetas indiretas. Foram analisados artigos publicados no LILLACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), BBO-ODONTOLOGIA (Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia), MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) e PUBMED (National Library of Medicine). Por intermédio dos resultados obtidos nesta revisão da literatura, onde 14 (quatorze) artigos ficaram para compor o estudo, foi possível verificar que através do aperfeiçoamento dos sistemas adesivos e das resinas compostas as facetas diretas podem restabelecer a cor, a forma e a funcionalidade dental, permitindo reabilitar estético-funcionalmente os elementos dentários, harmonizando-os com os demais componentes orofaciais do paciente, mas é imprescindível que se faça um correto diagnóstico e aplique uma boa técnica para que consiga ter um resultado satisfatório. Conclui-se que facetas diretas em resina composta são eficientes para reabilitar elementos dentários, permitindo estética agradável, bem como a função adequada. Sendo consideradas um procedimento conservador, de menor custo e mais rápido quando comparadas às facetas indiretas em cerâmica.

show abstract

“…The mechanical properties of restorative materials are commonly tested on specimens prepared on a laboratory bench without considering the location of the restoration in the oral cavity [16][17][18][19]. In vitro laboratory studies have shown differences in the porosity of composite resin specimens created by different practitioners [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Practitioner-Related Placement Variables on the Compressive Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins—An In Vitro Clinical Simulation Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: To determine if restoration location and/or execution behavior force parameters have an influence on the mechanical properties of bulk-fill composite dental restorations. Methods: Pressure transducers were placed within each quadrant of dental mannequin jaws. Cylindrical molds were placed above the transducers and filled with two bulk-fill composite materials, Filtek and Tetric, by four experienced dentists. Each dentist prepared five specimens per quadrant and material. The total placement time, mean force, number of peak forces (above 25 N), and mean peak(s) force during placement were measured. Then, the stiffness and maximal compressive strength of the specimens were determined while loading the specimens up to failure using a universal loading machine. Results: Placement time was affected by jaw (p < 0.004) and side (p < 0.029), with the shortest time demonstrated for the left side of the mandible. Force exerted during restoration placement was not normally distributed without differences in location (jaw) or material. A higher application force was found on the right side (p < 0.01). The number of peak forces was affected by side (p < 0.03), with less peaks on the left side. No significant differences were found in compressive strength when correlated to restoration location, participant, or material (p = 0.431). The stiffness values of Filtek (3729 ± 228 N/mm) were found to be 15% higher than Tetric (3248 ± 227 N/mm) (p < 0.005). No correlations were found between the compressive strength or stiffness and the amount of force applied during placement. Conclusions: The individual restoration material placement parameters did influence practitioner performance; however, these differences did not affect the mechanical properties of the final restoration.

show abstract

Comparison of conventional ceramic laminate veneers, partial laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations in fracture strength after aging

Cited by 25 publications

References 18 publications

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers

Facetas diretas anteriores: Uma revisão de literatura

Influence of Practitioner-Related Placement Variables on the Compressive Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins—An In Vitro Clinical Simulation Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About